The subject of Nagorno-Karabakh was once again among the agenda items during the 74th Session of the UN General Assembly this year, especially for Azerbaijan, Armenia and Turkey. Armenia approached the Nagorno-Karabakh subject by forming a new discourse.
Armenia’s Emphasis On Nagorno-Karabakh During The UN General Assembly
During his speech in the session, Pashinyan stated that he had expressed from the beginning that the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue must be applicable for the people of Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia but that, despite these expressions, Azerbaijan is not taking constructive steps and only wishes to deliver a solution suitable for the people of Azerbaijan. Afterwards, presumably with the expectation that he would be honored by the West’s interest and support, Pashinyan asserted a new claim and stated that Azerbaijan wishes to achieve its status during the Soviet era in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Pashinyan characterized this wish of Azerbaijan as a futile effort, made the statement that the people of Soviet-era “Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region” declared their independence and exercise their self-determination as did Azerbaijan seceding from the Soviet Union and continued his speech by expressing that “Azerbaijan’s position is tantamount of claiming restoration of Soviet Union”. Armenia’s UN Permanent Representative Ambassador Davit Knyazyan, who spoke at the 74th Session of the UN General Assembly, stated that “Restoration of Soviet Azerbaijan's 'territorial integrity' is impossible as much as that of Soviet Union”.
A Small Reminder
Pashinyan, who is maintaining a harsh and radical attitude regarding Nagorno-Karabakh, expressed in his recent speeches that Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Armenia; in 5 August 2019, Pashinyan stated that “Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Armenia” during the meeting in the so-called Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’s capital Stepanakert. Pashinyan stating “Karabakh is Armenia, period” during the press conference organized in Vanadzor is another example of Pashinyan’s controversial statements. While the Nagorno-Karabakh region was a region where Azerbaijani Turks were the majority demographically prior to Tsarist Russia’s invasion, after the invasion, during the Soviet era, the region’s demographic structure would change in which the Armenian population would increasingly rise and surpass the Azerbaijani Turks. The Nagorno-Karabakh region was a place that belonged to Azerbaijan before and during the Soviet period. Currently, as a result of the people of Azerbaijan being massacred and forced to flee their homes, the Armenians constitute the majority of the region’s population.
Within this context, the speeches of Pashinyan and Ambasador Knyazyan and the Armenian administration aimed to emphasize the imposibility of Nagorno-Karabakh going back to Azerbaijan’s hegemony; the impossibility of the Nagorno-Karabakh region’s population structure being distributed in Azerbaijan’s favor was implied. Yet until a period which can be considered recent, the Azerbaijani Turk population in the Nagorno-Karabakh region was the majority. Therefore, this statement by the new Armenia administration, in a way, is an admission that the Nagorno-Karabakh region belonged to Azerbaijan prior to Armenia’s invasion.
The Issue Of Nagorno-Karabakh In The UN General Assembly
Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, who made a speech on behalf of Azerbaijan in the UN General Assembly’s 74th Session, expressed that Armenia is misleading its own people and the international community. Moreover, he called on Armenia to give up its aggressive and hostile policy and fulfill its international obligations.
Therefore, the international community has witnessed the injustice of Armenia’s continuing invasion, despite the Decision of the UN General Assembly, and its playing with perceptions by speaking differently at Nagorno-Karabakh and the UNGA.
Aliyev’s Nagorno-Karabakh “Exclamation”
Aliyev, who spoke on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue in Sochi, emphasized that “Nagorno-Karabakh is historical Azerbaijan land” and stated that ethnic cleansing is being conducted against the Azerbaijanis. Additionally, he made the statement “Karabakh is Azerbaijan, exclamation”.
Within this scope, Aliyev’s statement can be perceived as a response to Pashinyan’s speech at the meeting in the Nagorno-Karabakh region and his speech at the UN General Assembly. Another aspect that makes us think is the Armenian administration’s discourses and efforts of playing on perceptions regarding the issue of the Nagorno-Karabakh region under the invasion of the Armenian Armed Forces in order to procure acceptance of the invasion’s ‘legitimacy’ to the UN General Assembly, despite the UN General Assembly’s Decision.
Lavrov’s Statements Regarding Nagorno-Karabakh
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who is one of the three co-presidents of the Minsk Group established for the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, criticized Pashinyan for describing Nagorno-Karabakh as “an integral part of Armenia”. Lavrov also indicated that such statements hamper the efforts to end the Karabakh conflict. This open criticism of Lavrov and the Armenian administration’s radical discourses and attitudes, which lead to deadlock regarding the subject of Nagorno-Karabakh, have been expressed through official channels.
 “Armenian diplomat at UN: Restoration of Soviet Azerbaijan's 'territorial integrity' impossible as much as that of Soviet Union”, Panorama.am, 30 September 2019 https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2019/09/30/Armenian-diplomat-UN/2173901
 “ERMENİSTAN BAŞBAKANINDAN ŞOK SÖZLER: DAĞLIK KARABAĞ ERMENİSTAN'INDIR”, AVİM Bulletin, 06 August 2019 https://avim.org.tr/tr/Bulten/ERMENISTAN-BASBAKANINDAN-SOK-SOZLER-DAGLIK-KARABAG-ERMENISTAN-INDIR
 “Paşinya'dan Azerbaycan iddialarına cevap: "Karabağ Ermenistan'dır ve nokta!"”, Ermeni Haber Ajansı, 17 September 2019, https://www.ermenihaber.am/tr/news/2019/09/17/PPa%C5%9Finyan-Karaba%C4%9F-Ermenistan/164405
 “AZERBAYCAN'DAN ERMENİSTAN'A BM'DE "DAĞLIK KARABAĞ" ÇAĞRISI”, AVİM Bulletin, 30 September 2019 https://avim.org.tr/tr/Bulten/AZERBAYCAN-DAN-ERMENISTAN-A-BM-DE-DAGLIK-KARABAG-CAGRISI
 “Ortalık kızıştı! "Karabağ, tarihi Azerbaycan toprağıdır"”, Milliyet, 03 October 2019 http://www.milliyet.com.tr/dunya/ortalik-kizisti-karabag-tarihi-azerbaycan-topragidir-6045746
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
THE DASHNAKSUTYUN’S MASK SLIPS
Berfin Mahide ERTEKİN 18.11.2019
PASHINYAN AND MNATSAKANYAN’S DISCREPANCIES REGARDING RELATIONS WITH TURKEY
Berfin Mahide ERTEKİN 02.10.2019
THE SUBJECT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH IN THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS
Berfin Mahide ERTEKİN 15.10.2019
A VISIT TO HAMPIG SASUNYAN FROM THE EPISCOPACY
Berfin Mahide ERTEKİN 02.10.2019
THE DASHNAKSUTYUN’S MASK SLIPS II
Berfin Mahide ERTEKİN 06.12.2019
ARMENIAN ATTEMPTS FOR THE RECOGNITION OF NAGORNO KARABAKH AND BELGIAN PARLIAMANTERIANS’ VISIT TO STEPANAKERT
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 27.03.2017
WHY TURKEY’S VIEW OF THE ARMENIAN ISSUE SHOULD NOT BE SUPPRESSED
Özdem Sanberk 29.06.2015
RUSSIAN MONEY IN DENMARK - 2
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 08.10.2018
TURKEY’S PRESIDENCY OF THE G-20 IN 2015
Hande Apakan 04.03.2015
DIASPORA ARMENIANS AND THEIR INITIATIVES FOR COMPENSATION: THE REFLECTIONS OF THE MOVSESIAN CASE II
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 29.02.2012
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
BOOK PRESENTATION - PHASE LINE ATTILA, THE AMPHIBIOUS CAMPAIGN FOR CYPRUS, 1974