On 20 March 2017, Pope Francis, the spiritual leader of the Roman Catholic Church, met with the President of Rwanda Paul Kagame at the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City. It has been revealed that at this meeting, which could be considered as highly significant in terms of the strained relations between Rwanda and the Holy See, Pope Francis apologized for the Catholic Church’s role in the Rwandan Genocide of 1994.
As it is known, the Rwandan Genocide in 1994, which claimed the lives of more than 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus at the hands of Hutu extremists, is one of the three cases that is acknowledged as genocide before international law. In Rwanda, Catholic institutions and missions, together with the colonial administration, have been accused of laying the grounds of divisions among the Rwandans that lead to the genocide in 1994. Members of the Catholic Church of Rwanda have been also accused for ignoring/facilitating the massacres, with some actively participating in the massacres. The Vatican, as well, has been criticized for its approach of denial with regards to the Rwandan Catholic Church’s role in the massacres and for not apologizing for the crimes committed by the Church members.
On 20 November 2016, an apology was issued by Rwandan Catholic bishops, which was considered as unsatisfying by many Rwandans and the Rwandan government. The Rwandan bishops were criticized for apologizing only for the role of some of its members in the genocide and not for the Rwandan Catholic Church’s role as an institution, with the Rwandan government appraising the bishops’ apology as an effort of “exonerating the Catholic Church as a whole for any culpability in connection with the Genocide.” The Rwandan government had also emphasized that Rwanda also expected a papal apology given the magnitude of the event.
The papal apology finally came after 23 years. According to a statement by the Holy See Press Office released after the meeting between Pope Francis and President Kagame, the Pope conveyed “his profound sadness, and that of the Holy See and of the Church, for the genocide against the Tutsi”, and expressed “his solidarity with the victims and with those who continue to suffer the consequences of those tragic events”. He implored “God’s forgiveness for the sins and failings of the Church and its members, among whom priests, and religious men and women who succumbed to hatred and violence, betraying their own evangelical mission”.
Pope Francis’ apology was positively received. President Paul Kagame, commenting on his meeting with the Pope on twitter, said that the meeting marked a “new chapter in relations between Rwanda and Catholic Church/Holy See”, and the Pope’s apology was an “act of courage”. In an official statement, Foreign Minister of Rwanda Louise Mushikiwabo said that the meeting was “characterized by a spirit of openness and mutual respect” and “a positive step forward in the relationship between Rwanda and the Holy See, based on a frank and shared understanding of Rwanda’s history and the imperative to combat genocide ideology.” However, the same statement reminded that “[Rwandan] genocide denial and trivialization continue to flourish in certain groups within the Church and genocide suspects have been shielded from justice within Catholic institutions.”
Indeed, the Pope’s apology for the Church’s role in the Rwandan Genocide is, no doubt, a positive step that could provide some closure for the Rwandan people. As pointed out in the above-mentioned official statement, the Pope and the Holy See is now expected to work towards the recognition of the fact of the Rwandan Genocide among all Church members, and make sure that genocide suspects in the Church stand trial. Yet, ultimately, the Pope finally did the right thing with his apology with respect to the recent, legally acknowledged case of genocide that took place in Rwanda in 1994.
Perhaps now the Pope has a better understanding of the legal concept and term of “genocide” and can do also the right thing with regards his stance towards the 1915 events. As it is known, Pope Francis, for the sake of ecumenism and Christian solidarity, has been insisting on using the “Armenian genocide” narrative against the Turks, despite historical and legal facts proving that the 1915 events cannot be characterized as “genocide”. Although the papacy was late to apologize for the Catholic Church’s role in the legally-established Rwandan Genocide that took place just a little over two decades ago in 1994, Pope Francis was rather rash after his ascendancy as pope to falsely accuse and defame Turks by labeling the controversial events that took place a century ago as “genocide”. The Pope, of course, is not expected to apologize for wrongfully labeling the 1915 events as "genocide" since the dogma of “papal infallibility” of the Catholic Church would not allow it. However, he can at least cease using the one-sided destructive "genocide" narrative that stigmatizes the Turks and also serves inter-religion polarization, and adopt a conciliatory attitude that would be congruent with his position as the spiritual leader of the Roman Catholic Church.
 Ali Murat Taşkent, “Catholic Church In Rwanda Apologizes For Role In Genocide”, AVİM, 05.12.2016, http://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/CATHOLIC-CHURCH-IN-RWANDA-APOLOGIZES-FOR-ROLE-IN-GENOCIDE
 “Press Communiqué: Audience With The President Of The Republic Of Rwanda, 20.03.2017”, Holy See Press Office, 20.03.2017, http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2017/03/20/170320c.html
 “President Kagame received by Pope Francis”, Republic of Rwanda, 20.03.2017, http://gov.rw/newsdetails2/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1716&cHash=bf39ea9b8539a73e1bfb4da8f921bc30
 Mehmet Oğuzhan Tulun, “Pope Francis’ Push for Ecumenism”, AVİM, 28.06.2016, http://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/POPE-FRANCIS-PUSH-FOR-ECUMENISM
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
SERZH SARGSYAN’S RECENT CONTACTS WITH THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE’S PARTY
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 25.10.2015
GERMAN FEDERAL ASSEMBLY’S UNFRIENDLY RESOLUTION TOWARDS TURKEY AND TURKISH PEOPLE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 14.06.2016
THE “GOLDEN ERA” OF CHINA-UK RELATIONS
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 02.11.2015
THE AFTERMATH OF THE DENIAL OF TERRORIST SASSOUNIAN’S PAROLE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 16.05.2017
A FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE CASE OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 31.05.2017
ARMENIAN ALLEGATIONS DO NOT HOLD WATER BEFORE JUDICIARY
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 27.01.2017
TANER AKÇAM AND AGOS DO NOT SURPISE US ANYMORE
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 08.05.2017
THE WAY OUT TO TURKISH-ARMENIAN RECONCILIATION COULD BE MUTUAL FORGIVENESS
Alev KILIÇ 11.11.2012
THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCHATE OF ISTANBUL HAVE MADE THE CORRECT OBSERVATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE ARMENIAN ISSUE
Gülsüm Gizem ÖZYOL 26.08.2016
THERE MAY BE HOPE: LET’S BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE RESOLUTION OF THE TURKISH-ARMENIAN CONTROVERSY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 24.02.2016
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)