In the AVIM analysis article entitled "France with Macron: The Destabilizing Factor in the Balkans", published a few days ago regarding the President of France Emmanuel Macron’s refusal of the membership talks for North Macedonia and Albania, we stated that “It appears that Macron continues to behave as if he is the major administrator of the EU”. In the same analysis it was also stressed that “those who arrogantly give advice to others must first give account for their own historical mistakes. Emmanuel Macron comes top of the list of those who should give account in this respect. Before the ink of the said analysis dried, a controversial comment of Macron which was interpreted by certain media outlets as “disparaging” concerning immigrations from Bulgaria and Ukraine was widely published in the international online press.
According to Politico, in an interview published Thursday in conservative weekly magazine “Valeurs Actuelles” the French President said that "I would rather have people who come from Guinea or Côte d'Ivoire legally, who are there and who do this work, than Bulgarian or Ukrainian clandestine networks”. He also seemed to criticize the EU's posted workers scheme, under which employers send temporary workers to other member countries and said that "I prefer to have legal migration, registered, under a quota, for x years, rather than hidden posted work".
It is reported in that regard that both Bulgaria and Ukraine filed diplomatic protests with France after the said comments. As per these reports, “Ukraine was quicker to react to Macron’s comments, with the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry summoning the French ambassador in Kyiv, Etienne de Poncins (who was also France’s ambassador in Bulgaria back in 2007-2010) for explanation. Subsequently, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying the French President’s words had been taken out of context”. On the other hand Bulgaria announced on November 2 that “it would summon the French ambassador to Sofia on November 4 to explain Macron's remark”.
It should be noted that there is a claim in certain online media sources which points to a different translation of Macron's comment in Bulgarian and Ukrainian media.As per this claim, Macron’s comment was reflected in a little bit different from its original based on the Sputnik’s report in German.According to this claim, Macron’s comment reflected as “I prefer legal immigrants from Guinea or Ivory…instead of illegal Ukrainian or Bulgarian gangs”. For this reason, the word “gang” was misunderstood in Bulgaria and Ukraine.
The possibility that Macron's controversial remarks are misunderstood in Bulgaria and in Ukraine because of a deliberate or unintentional mistranslation cannot be ruled out. However, given the basic features of the subject, the mistranslation does not alter the basic understanding of Macron's way of thinking.
As is well known, as an EU member state Bulgaria’s citizens are, in fact, entitled to live and work in France. In spite of the fact that Ukraine has not been recognized as an official EU candidate country, it is known that Ukrainian citizens were granted visa-free travel to the EU back in 2017. The EU decision states in that respect that “Approved by the Council in May, the agreement provides for visa-free travel for Ukrainian citizens with biometric passports travelling to the EU for up to 90 days in any 180-day period, for tourism, to visit relatives or friends, or for business purposes, but not to work. The exemption applies to all EU countries, except Ireland and the UK, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.” According to this arrangement, Ukrainian citizens can freely travel to France. If Ukrainian citizens want to work in France, they have to follow the established rules in France. The French authorities will apply these rules.
With this controversial remarks mentioned above, Macron makes it clear that he prefers workers from former colonies of France to the workers from an EU member state and from a Black Sea coastal country that has close ties with the EU. This comment in fact is prone to be interpreted as implicitly pointing to a longing in Macron's inner world for France’s colonial period.
*Photo: News Beezer
 Teoman Ertuğrul Tulun, “France With Macron: The Destabilizing Factor In The Balkans,” Center For Eurasian Studies (AVİM), November 1, 2019, sec. Analysis, 2019 / 24, https://avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/FRANCE-WITH-MACRON-THE-DESTABILIZING-FACTOR-IN-THE-BALKANS.
 “Ukraine, Bulgaria Angered By French President’s Migration Comments,” Radio Free Europe, sec. Ukraine, accessed November 2, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-bulgaria-angered-french-president-macron-migration-comments/30249877.html.
 Jakob Hanke, “Bulgaria and Ukraine Issue Formal Protest over Macron’s Migration Remarks,” Politico, November 2, 2019, https://www.politico.eu/article/bulgaria-and-ukraine-issue-formal-protest-over-macrons-migration-remarks/.
 Ivan Dikov, “Macron Enrages Bulgaria, Ukraine with Comment That He Prefers African Migrants,” European Views, November 2, 2019, https://www.european-views.com/2019/11/macron-enrages-bulgaria-ukraine-with-comment-that-he-prefers-african-migrants/.
 “Ukraine, Bulgaria Angered By French President’s Migration Comments.”
 “„Ukrainische und bulgarische Banden”: Macron sorgt mit Interview über Migration für heftigen Wirbel,” Sputnik, October 31, 2019, https://de.sputniknews.com/ausland/20191031325938887-ukrainische-bulgarische-banden-macron-interview-migration/.
 Dikov, “Macron Enrages Bulgaria, Ukraine with Comment That He Prefers African Migrants.”
 “Visa-Free Travel for Ukrainians Comes into Force,” European Union, June 11, 2017, sec. News, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/27990/Visa-free%20travel%20for%20Ukrainians%20comes%20into%20force.
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
AVİM ON THE ELEVENTH ANNIVERSARY OF ITS FOUNDING
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 05.02.2020
EU’S NEW CENTRAL ASIA STRATEGY AND NOTION OF CONSTRUCTIVE EURASIANISM
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 16.07.2019
UN FACT-FINDING MISSION REPORT ON MYANMAR CONFIRM THE IMPORTANCE OF GENOCIDE CONVENTION
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 12.09.2018
THE SHATTERING OF REGIONAL ANCHOR FOR STABILITY: THE PASSING OF KING BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 28.11.2016
A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF INDEPENDENCE OF CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES: THE DEMOGRAPHIC QUANDARY
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 08.11.2016
“YET ANOTHER DECISION AGAINST ARMENIA ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH” – COMMENTARY PUBLISHED IN HURRIYET DAILY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 18.11.2015
THE AMERICANA DEBACLE: THE ARCHITECTS OF DENIAL
POPE FRANCIS’ PUSH FOR ECUMENISM
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 28.06.2016
H. RES. 220 – A CONFLATION OF PAST AND PRESENT
CIA DECLASSIFIED THE DOCUMENTS ON THE COOPERATION BETWEEN ASALA AND PKK
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 14.02.2017
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
THE MONTREUX CONVENTION: A REGIONAL AND GLOBAL SAFETY VALVE
THE CENTENNIAL OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE THREE SOUTH CAUCASUS STATES: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY
“EURASIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TURKEY AND MONGOLIA”
CURRENT REFUGEE MOVEMENTS IN ASIA AND THEIR REFLECTIONS ON TURKEY