
The Balkans are among the important regions of our day. The Balkans are also constantly being brought to the agenda due to the problems of the EU member Balkan countries of their problems (migration of the young population, etc.), border disputes with each other, corruption in the countries. But unfortunately, some circles are fighting an imaginary scenario, instead of talking about the real problems of the Balkan countries. The main allegations in this scenario are Turkey’s private gains in the Balkans, the similarity of Russia’s and Turkey’s course of action in the Balkans, Turkish policies that are trying to remove Balkans from the EU. This study aims to answer these groundless allegations.
First of all, what “private gains” Turkey seeks in the Balkans is subject that arouses curiosity. It should be borne in mind, Turkey is also a Balkan country. And it is not just based on cultural similarity or historical background. Additionally, Turkey is geographically a Balkan country. I consider it useful to recall the naming the EU made when addressing this issue. As it is known, since the 2000s, the EU has added the name Western Balkans to its jargon[1]. According to this naming, non-EU Balkan countries; Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo are a part of the Western Balkans. However, there are also Balkan countries that are already EU members. All this naming, of course, brings up the following question: Where is the Eastern Balkans? In this case, if there are no ulterior motives in the naming, the requirement for Turkey to be the Eastern Balkans is a material fact. This is almost like proof of the Balkan identity that Turkey possesses. While being accused of taking action based on gains in the Balkans, Turkey is acting just like other countries of the region, in a region it belongs.
This brings us to the second sensational allegation “Similarities in Turkey’s and Russia’s policies towards Balkan countries”. Here, I would like to remind you again and again that Turkey is a Balkan country. Unlike Russia’s efforts of building relations with the regional countries based on religion and history, Turkey does not need to do this. In addition, from time to time, there are accusations that Russia has provocative activities that Turkey possesses the internal affairs of these countries. Turkey, with a quite different policy, is in a position where it respects all the Balkan countries’ sovereign rights and internal affairs. It would not be wrong to say that Turkey’s activities in the region remain limited to only using the instruments of soft power in the region.
The most basic accusation against Russia is that it is trying to move the Western Balkan countries away from the West. Interestingly enough, from time to time, some circles are trying to accuse Turkey with this and similar matters. Turkey is a NATO member since 1952, and with the EU candidacy, Turkey has shown that its intentions are not just maintaining good neighbor relations but more than that. Today, despite all these speculations and the EU’s anti-Turkey stance from time to time, Turkey still identifies itself as Western.
It is possible to think that there is a whole different game staged in the background of these allegations. And that is separating Turkey from Europe and giving it a different identity than its own to exclude it from the West. In addition, it is aimed to create an unfounded fear in the Balkan countries which have good relations with Turkey to exclude Turkey from its Balkan identity as well.
[1] Özge Nur Öğütçü, ““Batı Balkanlar” Kavramı, Balkanlar Ve Türkiye”, AVİM, (2017 June).1. (accessed 12.03.2019)
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
AN EVALUATION OF THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 08.07.2019 -
NORTH MACEDONIA IS ON HIS WAY TO NATO MEMBERSHIP
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 20.02.2019 -
CAN "NORTHERN MACEDONIA" SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 20.06.2018 -
TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP TRADE PACT WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES: INCREASED ELBOW ROOM FOR JAPAN IN EAST ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 10.01.2019 -
EASTERN BALKANS: TURKEY
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 29.03.2019
-
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE’S ARMENIA 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT
Mansur Ali GEDİK 20.07.2015 -
CHINA’S INTERACTION WITH CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES IS INCREASING
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 08.03.2022 -
UNDER WESTERN PRESSURE, KOSOVO VOTES IN FAVOR OF THE CREATION OF WAR CRIMES COURT
Tolga EZİK 11.08.2015 -
A QUARTER OF A CENTURY OF INDEPENDENCE OF CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES: THE DEMOGRAPHIC QUANDARY
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 08.11.2016 -
GEORGIA’S CONTRADICTORY POLICIES ENDANGER REGIONAL COOPERATION
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 07.02.2019
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER -
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
-
THE SEARCH FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR: VIEWS FROM GEORGIA AND TURKEY