The Balkans are among the important regions of our day. The Balkans are also constantly being brought to the agenda due to the problems of the EU member Balkan countries of their problems (migration of the young population, etc.), border disputes with each other, corruption in the countries. But unfortunately, some circles are fighting an imaginary scenario, instead of talking about the real problems of the Balkan countries. The main allegations in this scenario are Turkey’s private gains in the Balkans, the similarity of Russia’s and Turkey’s course of action in the Balkans, Turkish policies that are trying to remove Balkans from the EU. This study aims to answer these groundless allegations.
First of all, what “private gains” Turkey seeks in the Balkans is subject that arouses curiosity. It should be borne in mind, Turkey is also a Balkan country. And it is not just based on cultural similarity or historical background. Additionally, Turkey is geographically a Balkan country. I consider it useful to recall the naming the EU made when addressing this issue. As it is known, since the 2000s, the EU has added the name Western Balkans to its jargon. According to this naming, non-EU Balkan countries; Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo are a part of the Western Balkans. However, there are also Balkan countries that are already EU members. All this naming, of course, brings up the following question: Where is the Eastern Balkans? In this case, if there are no ulterior motives in the naming, the requirement for Turkey to be the Eastern Balkans is a material fact. This is almost like proof of the Balkan identity that Turkey possesses. While being accused of taking action based on gains in the Balkans, Turkey is acting just like other countries of the region, in a region it belongs.
This brings us to the second sensational allegation “Similarities in Turkey’s and Russia’s policies towards Balkan countries”. Here, I would like to remind you again and again that Turkey is a Balkan country. Unlike Russia’s efforts of building relations with the regional countries based on religion and history, Turkey does not need to do this. In addition, from time to time, there are accusations that Russia has provocative activities that Turkey possesses the internal affairs of these countries. Turkey, with a quite different policy, is in a position where it respects all the Balkan countries’ sovereign rights and internal affairs. It would not be wrong to say that Turkey’s activities in the region remain limited to only using the instruments of soft power in the region.
The most basic accusation against Russia is that it is trying to move the Western Balkan countries away from the West. Interestingly enough, from time to time, some circles are trying to accuse Turkey with this and similar matters. Turkey is a NATO member since 1952, and with the EU candidacy, Turkey has shown that its intentions are not just maintaining good neighbor relations but more than that. Today, despite all these speculations and the EU’s anti-Turkey stance from time to time, Turkey still identifies itself as Western.
It is possible to think that there is a whole different game staged in the background of these allegations. And that is separating Turkey from Europe and giving it a different identity than its own to exclude it from the West. In addition, it is aimed to create an unfounded fear in the Balkan countries which have good relations with Turkey to exclude Turkey from its Balkan identity as well.
 Özge Nur Öğütçü, ““Batı Balkanlar” Kavramı, Balkanlar Ve Türkiye”, AVİM, (2017 June).1. (accessed 12.03.2019)
© 2009-2018 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP TRADE PACT WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES: INCREASED ELBOW ROOM FOR JAPAN IN EAST ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 10.01.2019
THE OUTCOMES OF VOSTOK 2018
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 28.09.2018
CONFERENCE ENTITLED “TÜRKİYE VE KORE: GELİŞEN AVRASYA’DA İKİ KÖPRÜ BAŞI” (TURKEY AND KOREA: TWO BRIDGEHEADS IN THE THRIVING EURASIA)
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 30.11.2017
A VIEW ABOUT 18TH MEETING OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION COUNCIL OF HEADS OF MEMBER STATES
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 19.06.2018
NORTH MACEDONIA IS ON HIS WAY TO NATO MEMBERSHIP
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 20.02.2019
THE PROTOCOLS SIGNED WITH ARMENIA
Alev KILIÇ 21.10.2012
ANTI-TURKEY AND ANTI-TURKISH VIEWS EXPRESSED AT A CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY THE LSE TURKISH CHAIR
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 28.05.2015
DIASPORA ARMENIANS AND THEIR INITIATIVES FOR COMPENSATION: THE REFLECTIONS OF THE MOVSESIAN CASE
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 27.02.2012
TAIWAN’S POLITICAL TURN: TSAI ING-WEN’S ELECTED AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 20.01.2016
THE RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE’S PARTY - Ömer Engin LÜTEM
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 05.03.2015
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)