In December 2017, we published an analysis on the book entitled "Ararat Illusion". The book is on an Armenian assassin who was inspired by the murder of the two Turkish diplomats, Consul General Mehmet Baydar and Consul Bahadır Demir, by an elderly Armenian Gourgen Yanikian, in Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, in 1973. The Armenian assassin in the book appears under the cover of Antranik, a terrorist organization. The novel is about the actions and the murders of an Armenian terrorist against the federal government and its employees. In the novel, it is mentioned that the history repeats itself and that the Armenian terrorists wage a feud and revenge against Turks and Turkey.
The author of the novel is David Minier, the District Attorney for the Yanikian case, the murderer of two Turkish diplomats in Santa Barbara. It is understood that the author is very much affected by the murder of two Turkish diplomats, and that these murders constitute a trauma for him.
The author, Minier, expresses his regrets in an article which appears in the bulletin Armenian News Network / Groong. He is regretful that he did not let a number of “genocide victim” Armenians to testify as witnesses after Yanikian’s statements because his main aim at the time was to convict murderer Yanikian whereas if he let the Armenians testify it would have been a foregone conclusion to acquit Yanikian just as Tehlirian, the murderer of Talat Paşa acquitted by the jury in 1921. Now he expresses that he is deeply saddened by that very decision that he made.
Mr. Minier notes that if he acted in the opposite way, the Turkish government’s argument that "there is no court decision on the so-called genocide therefore the 1915 events could not be assumed as genocide” would have collapsed. Minier states that he regrets his decision and that he cannot forget the demands of Yanikian's lawyers to let those Armenian witnesses testify. Minier, in his article, claims that despite Turkey's denialist stance, there is historical evidence that there was a genocide committed against the Armenians. He continues that 48 US states and at least 25 countries in the world recognized and condemned it.
It seems that the former attorney Minier has changed his attitude and now he is upset by his healthy and lawful stance during the trial in Santa Barbara. It is difficult to fathom the motives behind his newly adopted attitude. There is the danger that he will bring into disrepute the brilliant background that he had as a respectable jurist. And no doubt he is making a great mistake.
At least, the following two issues must be answered in a legal and impartial manner:
In the Berlin court,
- After Tehlirian's statement, while the jury decided to acquit Tehlirian in less than two hours, the jury in California did not acquit Yanikian even when the members of the jury were in tears. Could it be that the understanding and practice of law in the world has advanced and developed over the past 52 years?
- Minier seems to regret not to let a "witnesses parade" during the trial. What if Yanikian was acquitted after the statements of witnesses’ prejudices, hatred and grudge, how would Minier feel? Would he have to write the exact opposite of what he writes presently?
In our opinion, Minier, should seek answers to these questions in his conscience and should not be upset just because he did not participate in the "genocide bandwagon". As a result, he has fulfilled his duties honestly as Attorney of the Yanikian case. As a matter of fact, the book titled "Ararat Illusion" which reveals not only his lawyer identity but also his righteousness is a reflection of Minier’s true stand. David Minier, who is now retired, would be consistent in avoiding such statements, which cast doubt on his bright legal career.
Photo courtesy: (from left to right) Prosecutor James Lindsay, accused Gourgen Yanikian, District Attorney David Minier, Prosecutor Vasken Minasian, 1972. (fresnobee.com)
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
REGIONAL COOPERATION POSSIBILITIES AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE IN THE CAUCASUS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 09.12.2014
COMMON SENSE HAS WON: CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR DENIED THE PAROLE OF SASSOUNIAN
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 17.05.2017
IS FRANCE A RELIABLE ALLY?
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 28.12.2018
NO PERMISSION TO SO-CALLED GENOCIDE MONUMENT ATTEMPTS IN SWEDEN
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 08.03.2018
TWISTED LAW AND DOCUMENTED HISTORY - GEOFFREY ROBERSON'S OPINION ON GENOCIDE AGAINST PROVEN FACTS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 30.11.2013
THE DISPUTE OVER THE ELECTION OF THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCH OF ISTANBUL HAS YET AGAIN INTENSIFIED
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 15.11.2016
PARADOXICAL COOPERATION: CSTO MEMBER ARMENIA CONDUCTS MILITARY EXERCISES WITH NATO
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 21.04.2015
THE COLLECTIVE SECURITY ORGANISATION SUMMIT IN KYRGYZSTAN
Alev KILIÇ 29.05.2013
DEATH OF A SHEPHERD
Alev KILIÇ 05.08.2013
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AFTER THE HOLIDAYS IV
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 07.09.2011
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
THE CENTENNIAL OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE THREE SOUTH CAUCASUS STATES: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY
“EURASIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TURKEY AND MONGOLIA”
SECURITY, STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE WIDER BLACK SEA REGION