As it is known, on 15 October 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) declared its judgment on the Perinçek v. Switzerland case. In its judgement, the Grand Chamber found that Switzerland violated Doğu Perinçek’s right to freedom of expression. It ruled that Mr. Perinçek, who was sued calling the Armenian ‘genocide’ allegations an ‘international lie’, was wrongfully convicted by Swiss Courts.
The final judgement of the ECtHR is binding and establishes a case law for the members of the European Council. As consequence of this judgement which legally proves the violation of Mr. Perinçek’s right to freedom of expression, Switzerland is expected to make necessary amendments in its legislation or practices to prevent such violations in the future.
However, what will Switzerland do for its past violation of the rights to freedom of expression regarding three Turks - Ali Mercan, Ethem Kayalı and Hasan Kemahlı – who did not appeal to the ECtHR?
On 16 October 2008, the Winterthur district court had found Ali Mercan guilty for calling the ‘Armenian genocide’ a historical and international lie during a meeting held on June 30, 2007 in Winterthur, Switzerland. Ethem Kayalı and Hasan Kemahlı, chairmans of Atatürkist Ideas Associations (ADD) in Bern and Zurich, were found guilty by the court for being accomplices to the alleged crime, since they were the organizers of the meeting. The appeals by the defendants were turned down by the Zurich Court of Appeals on February 9, 2010, then by the Swiss Federal Court on September 16, 2010. Ultimately, their sentences converted to pay fines. 
How will Switzerland make up for the violated rights of Ali Mercan, Ethem Kayalı and Hasan Kemahlı? In general terms, what will Switzerland do for the Turkish community in Switzerland which, for years, was deprived of their right to freedom of expression?
Switzerland is known for restricting the right to freedom of expression against the Turks regarding the events of 1915. In line with the policies of the ‘genocide lobby’, the Swiss government, for years, has suppressed ideas opposing the ‘Armenian genocide’ narrative and force the Armenian version of history upon its people. While allowing Armenians to make their propaganda, it prevented Turks from responding to these false propaganda activities.
Furthermore, Swiss laws went as far as outlawing the rejection of the ‘Armenian genocide’ narrative. Turks were silenced under the threat of being prosecuted. As seen in the Perinçek case and the above-mentioned case involving three Turks, those who openly expressed their views were convicted by Swiss courts. Overall, Turks were prevented from defending themselves and their history against the Armenian allegations regarding the events of 1915.
Within this context, the final judgement of the ECtHR manifests that Turks have been victimized by Switzerland for all these years.
Consequently, Switzerland is expected to draw the necessary lessons from this judgement. First and foremost, it must immediately take necessary actions to prevent the above-mentioned violations of freedom of expression. Additionally, it must cease to impose the one-sided Armenian version of history and enable Turks to utter freely their opposing views.
Moreover, Switzerland must apologize to Turks for restricting their freedom of expression and silencing them for all these years. First and foremost, it must apologize to those who were sentenced for having expressed their views. These apologies will at least be an acknowledgement of the wrong and injustice perpetrated against the Turkish community living in Switzerland.
 Ömer Engin Lütem, “Olaylar ve Yorumlar”, Ermeni Araştırmaları, issue 36 (2010), pp. 51-52
 Pulat Tacar, “Ermenilerin Soykırım Savın Yadsıyanları Cezalandırmak veya Türkiye’den Tazminat Almak Amacı ile Yaptıkları Yargı Mücadeleleri”, Ermeni Araştırmaları, issue 50 (2015), pp.430-440
 Tanju Sümer, “Restrıctıon of the Turkish Community’s Right to Freedom of Expression in Switzerland”, AVIM, http://www.avim.org.tr/yorumnotlarduyurular/en/RESTRICTION-OF-THE-TURKISH-COMMUNITY%E2%80%99S-RIGHT-TO-FREEDOM-OF-EXPRESSION-IN-SWITZERLAND---Tanju-SUMER/4263
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
TURKEY BECAME THE 11th LARGEST PARTNER OF THE NEW ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 21.01.2016
THE “GOLDEN ERA” OF CHINA-UK RELATIONS
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 02.11.2015
BOOK REVIEW: ARMENIAN ALLEGATIONS AND FACTS (ERMENİ SUÇLAMALARI VE GERÇEKLER)
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 09.07.2015
GERMANY AT THE FOREFRONT OF ANTI-TURKISM
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 24.06.2015
POPE FINALLY APOLOGIZES FOR CHURCH’S ROLE IN THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 23.03.2017
THE NEW LEGAL BASIS FOR EU-ARMENIA RELATIONS
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.07.2018
A NEW PAGE FOR ARMENIA-EU RELATIONS?
Özge Nur ÖĞÜTCÜ 06.04.2017
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS NOT TO BE SELECTIVE
A VISIT FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT TO THE SO-CALLED STATE IN NAGORNO – KARABAKH UNDER OCCUPATION
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 23.10.2018
INCOHORENCE OF THE WEST: ASSERTING A CLAIM OF GENOCIDE WITHOUT QUESTIONING THEMSELVES
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
BOOK PRESENTATION - PHASE LINE ATTILA, THE AMPHIBIOUS CAMPAIGN FOR CYPRUS, 1974