Following the “Parliamentary” elections held on 3 May 2015 in Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijan’s territory which is under occupation of Armenia for more than 20 years, “local elections” were held on 13 September 2015. Many countries and international organizations declared that they do not recognize the results of these elections.
Statements underlined Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity within its sovereignty and internationally recognized borders, and indicated that these elections were illegal.
The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs also condemned these elections. The Ministry’s statement on the latest “local elections” is as follows:
“The above mentioned “local elections”, planned to be held within a short time following the “Parliamentary” elections held on 3 May 2015 in the said region, are a clear breach of the principles of international law, the UN Security Council resolutions and the principles of the OSCE. This and other similar actions impair the efforts to reach a peaceful and lasting solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Turkey condemns these elections which will constitute a new violation of Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. These elections and its results, which we consider illegal shall not be recognized by Turkey.”
In her statement, the spokeswoman for the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy the European Union said that the European Union does not recognize the constitutional and legal framework within which “elections” are being held in Nagorno-Karabakh. A similar statement was made on the elections held on May 3.
Spokesperson for the US Department of State also stated that the United States does not recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent sovereign state, and they will not accept the results of the so-called elections on the 13th of September as affecting the legal status of the region.
Furthermore, in addition to countries such as Germany, Ukraine, China, Pakistan and Indonesia, similar statements were made also by international organizations such as OSCE and Islamic Cooperation Organization.
The increasing number of countries and organizations day by day which emphasizes Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and sovereignty is causing political disappointments for Armenia, which also took a major legal blow by ECHR’s judgement on the “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia”. It is seen that Armenia’s efforts to legitimize the ‘republic’ in Nagorno-Karabakh through elections are fruitless. The obvious fact that Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding seven regions, which are internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territories, are occupied by Armenia is uttered more commonly.
Certainly, it is a known fact that some of the above-mentioned countries apply double standards on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. It is clear that these countries which took up a clear position on the Crimean issue are not as determined on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue which remains unresolved for more than 20 years. However, reactions to these elections and ECHR’s final judgment are positive developments in terms of the violation of international law in Nagorno-Karabakh.
 For the detailed information on ECHR’s judgement on the case of “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia” see. Turgut Tuncel, “The Nagorno-Karabakh Issue from a Juridical Point of View: the Case of Chiragov and Others v. Armenia”, AVIM, http://www.avim.org.tr/yorumnotlarduyurular/en/THE-NAGORNO-KARABAKH-ISSUE-FROM-A-JURIDICAL-POINT-OF-VIEW:-THE-CASE-OF-CHIRAGOV-AND-OTHERS-V--ARMENIA/4133
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
ARMENIA’S PROPAGANDA PROJECT IN EUROVISION 2015
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 31.05.2015
THE AFTERMATH OF THE DENIAL OF TERRORIST SASSOUNIAN’S PAROLE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 16.05.2017
THE DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVED BY THE POLITICAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF PACE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 29.11.2015
CATHOLIC CHURCH IN RWANDA APOLOGIZES FOR ROLE IN GENOCIDE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 05.12.2016
SERZH SARGSYAN’S RECENT CONTACTS WITH THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE’S PARTY
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 25.10.2015
FORGETFULNESS OF POPE FRANCIS AND PRESIDENT GAUCK: ACCIDENTAL OR WILLFUL?
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 14.05.2015
RESOLUTIONS ON 1915 CAME ONE AFTER ANOTHER FROM U.S. SENATE
WILL THE U.S. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GIVE GREEN LIGHT TO TERRORISM?
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 09.01.2017
FORMER ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER V. OSKANIAN IS INCRIMINATED
Alev KILIÇ 04.10.2012
BOOK REVIEW: “TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASININ BAŞLICA SORUNLARI” (MAJOR ISSUES OF THE TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY)
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 06.08.2015
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)