This is the English translation of a Turkish-language article that was originally published by AVİM on 30 May 2022.
While Western countries have imposed various sanctions on Russia due to the war in Ukraine, China's attitude towards this war and the effects of the war on China are a matter of debate. While the friction between China and the US continues on many issues (especially the Taiwan issue), China is cautiously approaching Russia so that its economy will not be exposed to a negative impact while trying to seize possible opportunities.
Ever since China’s reforms and opening up to the world, the effect of economic factors comes to the fore in its foreign policy. After the 2008 crisis, China has been one of the countries that benefited the most from the global structure of the economy. While protectionism has risen in Western countries, especially in the US, China has come to the fore in advocating for globalization. Since Russia's war in Ukraine started, China has taken the necessary precautions so that its trade with Western countries would not be interrupted. The lines of the China-Europe freight trains service that pass through Ukraine have been suspended, but the Polish Northern Line continues shipping to the West.
One of the sanctions imposed on Russia was the exclusion of Russian banks from the SWIFT international payment system. It has been reported that 7 Russia-based and 3 Belarus-based entities have been disconnected from the SWIFT network. Currently, SWIFT is one of the easiest ways to handle cross-border financial transactions, but there are alternative ways to order interbank transactions as well. However, it is foreseen that this sanction will have negative effects on the Russian economy. When Iran was excluded from the SWIFT in 2012, it had a 30% negative impact on Iran’s foreign trade. While China predominantly uses SWIFT for international payment orders, in parallel to this, it established the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) in 2015. In April, Russian Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov suggested linking Russia's payment system and China's CIPS, and adding those of Brazil, India, and South Africa. According to Barry Eichengreen, a professor of economics, there are aspects of CIPS that still need to be developed (such as the messaging system being connected to SWIFT) and states that Silanov's proposal cannot be realized in the short term, and that China must have an interest in it to take a step in this direction. Eichengreen also adds that the Yuan accounts for 2% of the current international payment transactions, but that as a possible scenario, two independent monetary and financial systems may emerge in the future.
It is also reported that there is an uptick in requests to open accounts at branches of Chinese state banks in Russia. In addition, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) froze lending to Russia and Belarus. It is thought that China, the largest shareholder of AIIB, may have had an influence on the decision to stop the loans after considering the current risks. The New Development Bank (NDB), which was established by the BRICS countries, has also put new transactions in Russia on hold, citing uncertainties and restrictions.
Visa and Mastercard have announced that they will not support credit cards issued by Russian banks by breaking off their relations with Russian banks. Russian banks, including Sberbank and Alfa Bank, have stated that they are considering issuing cards that connect Russia's Mir and China's UnionPay card networks. Using UnionPay could have allowed credit cardholders in Russia to conduct international transactions, but UnionPay has refused to cooperate. It is stated that UnionPay has decided not to expand its presence in Russia, as it fears that it may be the next target of the sanctions.
It is seen that China is on the alert for possible sanctions that may be imposed against her in the future. Various news sources reported that China-based oil and gas company China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) plans to sell some of its assets in the US, UK and Canada amid growing concern that it could be targeted by sanctions. However, a statement has come from the financial officer of CNOOC denying this news. Nevertheless, the Chinese government appears to be prepared for the risks. China’s government has ordered a “stress test” which includes building a policy response if China is ever the target of similar sanctions. It has been reported that this exercise involved the activities of some government agencies overseeing banking regulations and international trade. It was also noted that, in view of the sanctions imposed on Russian businesspeople, the Chinse Communist Party’s Central Organization Department have issued an internal notice that bars senior officials and their spouses and children from holding overseas real estate and equity in foreign companies.
When we look at China's trade with Russia, it is seen that China’s exports to Russia have slumped compared to the data of the previous year. This is thought to be due to the decisions taken against the risk that secondary sanctions could be imposed on Chinese companies. Chinese cell phone manufacturers such as Huawei, Xiaomi and Oppo have cut back cell phone shipments to Russia by over 50 percent. It is also reported that Chinese oil companies Sinopec, CNOOC, PetroChina, and Sinochem are avoiding new oil contracts with Russia. These companies continue to transact with Russia under existing contracts. In addition, the news that China is discreetly purchasing Russian crude oil from a lower price has also been on the agenda.
Chinese Ministry of Commerce spokesperson has stated that Chinese companies “must not submit to external coercion and make improper statements.” Besides that, the Chinese Ambassador in Moscow has called on Chinese businesspeople to quickly “fill the void” referring to the sanctions imposed on Russia.
While China evaluates the economic opportunities arising from the crisis due to the sanctions imposed on Russia, she approaches the situation cautiously for fear of being the next target of the sanctions. China, as one of the countries that benefit the most from the global nature of the economy, currently refrains from confronting the international community. However, it is seen that China is already in preparation for possible sanctions that may be imposed against her in the future.
 “China-Europe freight trains undisrupted amid escalating crisis in Ukraine, contingency plan considered”, Global Times, March 09, 2022, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202203/1254468.shtml
 “An update to our message for the SWIFT Community”, SWIFT, March 20, 2022, https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/message-swift-community
 Benjamin Curry, “Should Russia Be Removed From SWIFT?”, Forbes, February 25, 2022, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/personal-finance/swift-russia-ukraine-war/
 Barry Eichengreen, “Sanctions, SWIFT, and China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payments System”, CSIS, May 20, 2022, https://www.csis.org/analysis/sanctions-swift-and-chinas-cross-border-interbank-payments-system
 Samuel Shen and Andrew Galbraith, “Russian firms rush to open Chinese bank accounts as sanctions bite – sources”, Reuters, March 4, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/business/exclusive-russian-firms-rush-open-chinese-bank-accounts-sanctions-bite-sources-2022-03-03/
 “China-based AIIB freezes lending to Russia and Belarus over Ukraine war”, Financial Times, March 3, 2022, https://www.ft.com/content/5cdc910e-7a8a-4a3b-8c37-b831a0699cfb
 “A Statement By The New Development Bank”, NDB, March 3, 2022, https://www.ndb.int/press_release/a-statement-by-the-new-development-bank/
 Jane Li, “Russian banks are seeking refuge in a Chinese payment system”, Quartz, March 7, 2022, https://qz.com/2138460/russian-banks-are-seeking-refuge-in-a-chinese-payment-system/
 “China’s Visa, Mastercard Alternative Backs Away From Russia”, The Moscow Times, April 21, 2022,
 “China's CNOOC plans North Sea oil exit in strategic shift”, Reuters, March 30, 2022 https://www.reuters.com/world/china/exclusive-chinas-cnooc-plans-north-sea-oil-exit-strategic-shift-2022-03-30/
 “China oil major CNOOC has 'no plan to exit' any region: executive”, Nikkei Asia, April 28, 2022, https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Energy/China-oil-major-CNOOC-has-no-plan-to-exit-any-region-executive
 “Beijing orders ‘stress test’ as fears of Russia-style sanctions mount”, the Guardian, May 4, 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/04/beijing-orders-stress-test-as-fears-of-russia-style-sanctions-mount
 Chun Han Wong, “China Insists Party Elites Shed Overseas Assets, Eyeing Western Sanctions on Russia”, The Wall Street Journal, May 19, 2022 https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-insists-party-elites-shed-overseas-assets-eyeing-western-sanctions-on-russia-11652956787
 “China’s Exports to Russia Slump After Ukraine Invasion”, Bloomberg, April 13, 2022, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-13/china-s-exports-to-russia-slump-after-invasion-of-ukraine?sref=mxbIZFb4
 “Chinese smartphone shipments to Russia plunge as rouble collapses”, Financial Times, March 9, 2022, https://www.ft.com/content/8f3e0214-94b1-4d73-b34f-31c189437578
 “China state refiners shun new Russian oil trades, teapots fly under radar”, Reuters, April 7, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/exclusive-china-state-refiners-shun-new-russian-oil-trades-teapots-fly-under-2022-04-06/
 “China Is Quietly Taking Cheap Russian Crude as India Buys More”, Bloomberg, March 24, 2022, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-24/china-is-quietly-taking-cheap-russian-crude-as-india-buys-more
 “China-Russia relations: Chinese producers lament loss of once-lucrative Russian deals”, Yahoo, May 21, 2022, https://www.yahoo.com/now/china-russia-relations-chinese-producers-093000345.html
 “Beijing Tells Chinese in Russia to Help Fill Economic Void”, Bloomberg, March 22, 2022 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-22/beijing-tells-chinese-firms-in-russia-to-help-fill-economic-void?sref=mxbIZFb4
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
POLITICAL INSTABILITY BRINGS OBSTACLES TO MOLDOVA ON THE WAY TOWARDS THE EU
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 23.06.2020
PROTESTS AND POLITICAL CRISIS IN KAZAKHSTAN
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 11.02.2022
THE CENTENNIAL OF TURKEY-AFGHANISTAN RELATIONS
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 10.03.2021
THE SAMARKAND SUMMIT OF THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 12.12.2022
TALIBAN’S ADVANCEMENT AFTER THE WITHDRAWAL OF FOREIGN TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 30.07.2021
TURKISH PM’S ARMENIAN STATEMENT UNIMAGINABLE JUST 20 YEARS AGO
“MONTENEGRO AND THE BALKANS” MEETING ORGANIZED BY AVIM AND ANKARA UNI. CENTER OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RESEARCH
Hande Apakan 17.03.2015
THE COLLECTIVE SECURITY ORGANISATION SUMMIT IN KYRGYZSTAN
Alev KILIÇ 29.05.2013
GREECE GRANTED FURLOUGH TO TERRORIST KUFODINAS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 10.01.2019
THERE MAY BE HOPE: LET’S BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE RESOLUTION OF THE TURKISH-ARMENIAN CONTROVERSY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 24.02.2016
MEN ARE LIKE THAT
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"