Today, Yerevan is the capital of Armenia. With a population of more than a million, it is the country’s political, financial, industrial and cultural center. Yet, at the beginning of the 19th century, it was a Turkish-Azerbaijani rather than an Armenian city. The transformation of Yerevan from a Turkish-Azerbaijani city to an Armenian one constitutes one of the earliest examples for the modern concepts of demographic engineering and ethnic cleansing. This inconvenient fact, however, is persistently ignored and covered up by Armenian statesmen and diaspora spokespersons. The recent remarks by Serzh Sargsyan, the President of Armenia, must be seen within this context.
In a recent visit to France, Armenian President Sargsyan revealed his government’s plans to celebrate the 2800th anniversary of the foundation of Armenia’s capital, Yerevan, with special reference to the city’s continuous Armenian identity. However, Sargsyan’s contentions concerning the uninterrupted Armenian character of the city do not conform to reality. More interestingly, Sargsyan’s remarks also prompted indirect responses from Ilham Aliyev, the President of Azerbaijan as well as the director of the Institute of History at Azerbaijan's Academy of Sciences, who asserted the Azerbaijani-Turkish character of the city’s past. In a speech delivered at a congress of his New Azerbaijan Party, President Aliyev stated that “Yerevan is our historical land and we Azerbaijanis must return to these historical lands.” Yagub Mahmudov, the director of the Institute of History at National Academy of Sciences, similarly stated that Armenians are not the natives of the South Caucasus but that “they were moved to these lands by tsarist Russia.”
The story of Yerevan’s foundation goes back to the 8th century BC, when Argishti I of the Urartu Kingdom founded the fortress of Erebuni, which served as a defense fort against the attacks from the north. As the Urartu Kingdom gradually weakened and collapsed, the area came under the control of the Persians, who ruled it for more than two centuries between the 6th and 4th centuries BC. Later, the clash the between Alexander the Great and the Persians weakened the latter and the Persians lost the control of region, giving rise to the ancient Armenian Kingdom. But the Armenian control over the region of Yerevan was not to be permanent as the Byzantine and Sassanian Empires swallowed up the kingdom and partitioned its territories in the 4th century, giving the control of Yerevan once again to the Persians. This was followed by the Arab conquest of the region in 685 AD and the region fell under the authority of the Umayyad Caliphate. In 11th century, the city was briefly controlled by the Byzantine until the Seljuk Turks took the city in 1064 and ruled the entire area. This was followed by the Mongol-Ilkhanid conquest of the region in 1236, which ended at the end of 13th century when Turks re-conquered the region.
The region’s subsequent history involved frequent changes of control over the region between the Iranian (which was made up of the Shia Turks to a very significant extent) and Ottoman Empires, which lasted until the late 18th century, when the Turkish Qajar Dynasty established Khanate of Erivan. The Erivan Khanate ruled the area until it was conquered by the Russians in 1828, following the signing of the Turkmenchay Treaty in 1828. Such is the veracity of President Sargsyan’s remarks concerning the uninterrupted Armenian character of the city.
The Russian conquest was to play significant role in the city’s ethno-religious composition and was the determining factor in demographic changes that would subsequently take place. According to Mehnan Abdullaev, the head of the history department at Baku State University, at the time of the Russian conquest, “the overwhelming majority of the population in the Irevan, Nakhchivan and Ordubad regions - 78.4 percent accounted for Azerbaijani Turks.” He further added that “During the [Russian] occupation of 359 Azerbaijani villages (310 in the Irevan province), their population was massacred and expelled from their houses.”
In a study examining the breakup of the Erivan Khanate on the basis of Russian and Persian sources, Armenian historian George Bournoutian estimated that around 30 percent of the Muslim population of the Erivan Khanate “either died or emigrated” as a result of the Russian conquest. This was followed by settling 45,000 Armenians into their lands until 1832. But even with these massive population movements, the Armenians still did not make up a clear majority in the region. It was only at the end of the 19th century and early 20th century, following war and continuous migration and emigration “that the Armenians established a solid majority in the region”
Today, there are no Azerbaijani Turks left in Yerevan, a city where they once constituted around 80 percent of the population. Successive generations of Armenian statesmen not only failed to admit that the Armenian dominance over the region was established through massacres and ethnic cleansing but also persistently denied its Azerbaijani-Turkish past. Sargsyan’s recent remarks clearly constitutes a provocation to Azerbaijan through blatant distortion of history.
 "Studies prove that before 1918, there was no Armenian state in S.Caucasus," Trend.az, February 13, 2018, https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/politics/2859965.html
 "Historian: Armenians resettled to regions that never belonged to them," Trend.az, February 12, 2018, https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/society/2859894.html
 George Bournoutian, Eastern Armenia in the Last Decades of Persian Rule, 1807-1828 (Malibu: Undena Publications, 1982), p. 74.
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN
AVİM HELD A CONFERENCE ON MONGOLIA’S POTENTIAL IN THE REGION, THE CURRENT SITUATION IN MONGOLIA PRIOR TO THE 11TH ASIA-EUROPE MEETING (ASEM) AND TURKISH-MONGOLIAN RELATIONS
GRANDMA'S TATTOOS: ANOTHER FALSIFICATION
CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN ARMENIA
IRAN, KAZAKHSTAN, TURKMENISTAN AND CHINA: REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY
Özge Nur ÖĞÜTCÜ 09.05.2016
OUTSIDE INTERVENTION TO THE ELECTION OF THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCH OF ISTANBUL CONTINUES
A TALE OF TWO STATEMENTS
CAN SREBRENICA GENOCIDE BE COMPARED TO THE EVENTS OF 1915 WITHIN THE SCOPE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?
ANNOUNCEMENT - DECLARATION ON THE PROTEST MARCH TO BE ORGANIZED BY THE RETIRED OFFICIALS OF THE FOREIGN MINISTRY IN ANKARA ON 25 APRIL 2015
Ali Kenan 21.04.2015
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)