The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) summit, comprising the United States, India, Japan, and Australia took place on 12 March. The recent revival of QUAD, which was founded in 2007 and reestablished in 2017 but remained as an ineffective initiative, is due to the uneasiness over China’s rise and the security threat it is perceived to pose to the international order. However, there was no direct reference to military security considerations against China in QUAD’s first joint statement. Rather, the most important results of the summit were related to COVID-19 vaccine production, facilitating cooperation on emerging technologies, and preventing climate change. In addition, it was agreed to create a supply chain to reduce China’s monopoly in high-tech industries ranging from mobile phones to radars. Yet, it is no coincidence that the pace of QUAD meetings and military exercises has increased in recent years as China has begun to exploit its East Asian neighbors and encroach on the Indian Ocean region.
Regardless of China’s economic and military rise coupled with its human rights violations and autocratic form of government, all four QUAD countries continue to be deeply intertwined with the Chinese economy, as China is their largest trading partner. This increasing strength of China in military, economic, and technological terms deepen the competition felt by the US and it may find itself increasingly isolated if it continues its fight with China. Instead of dealing with China’s political-economic, diplomatic, and technological development through armed combat or threats, the US has turned to the aim of determining common policies with countries that it can trust in Asia through initiatives such as the QUAD. In terms of military power, China poses a technologically advanced threat to US interests in South Asia, the South China Sea, and the East China Sea. In terms of the economy, China is a major player in global supply chains and it is currently the top vaccine supplier. It is a rapidly rising power that has reached large capital and investors globally through the Belt and Road Initiative. As the joint statement focuses on establishing working groups on vaccine development and critical technologies, QUAD aims to inhibit the shifting of the global order to China.
In line with these developments, the US Joe Biden administration is trying to increase the power of the US by establishing closer relations with the allies in the Asia-Pacific. At the virtual QUAD summit, Biden stated that his strategy to face up to the Chinese challenge is to reinforce ties with democratic countries in the effort to make China play by the international rules and to make the US ready for the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” for which Beijing has been making substantial investments. “We will have strong competition, but we insist China play by international rules: fair competition, fair practice is fair trade” he added. In his speech, Biden also described Chinese President Xi Jinping as a “smart, smart guy” who “doesn’t have a democratic – with a small ‘D’ – bone in his body.
After the speeches at this meeting, China’s reaction to QUAD was swift. The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the group of undermining China’s interests. Meanwhile, the Chinese Defense Ministry said the group “hangs on to Cold War mentality, pursues group confrontation, is keen on geopolitical games, uses the so-called China challenge as an excuse to form cliques, and openly incites discord between regional countries.” Some commentators have described QUAD as a platform that cannot speak with one voice and lacks a true institutional structure. Others fear it might turn into an Asian NATO that will provoke China’s backlash. Therefore, QUAD has been the focus of concerns and criticism in China. The formation of QUAD as a mechanism to stop China’s global rise is seen as the proof that China has the potential to gain strength in the near future that will rival and perhaps surpass the US.
Without a strategy to fill China’s economic role in the region, there will be no prospect for achieving an effective balance of power in the Indo-Pacific. Beijing’s use of economic pressure is evident in its harsh attitude towards India and Australia. This situation has pushed the QUAD economies to create new economic integration models. Accordingly, the Supply Chain Resilience Initiative, launched by India, Japan, and Australia in September 2020, heralded QUAD’s upcoming economic focus. Despite QUAD’s intentions and policy initiatives, it is not easy to reduce China’s economic presence in the Indo-Pacific. Among the world’s largest economies, only China has managed to record a positive growth rate in 2020, with exports at an all-time high. Beijing’s ratification of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment with the EU was another signal of its determination to become the central economic power of the region. Nevertheless, QUAD will be a useful coalition in the long run, as it pays attention not only to the balance of military power in the region but also to economic power.
Ultimately, QUAD’s determination to challenge China’s monopolies and create new patterns of economic integration sends a signal to Beijing that the QUAD’s members are willing to suffer short-term losses to reduce their vulnerabilities in the long run. QUAD will also address the skepticism expressed by ASEAN and other countries in the region, which has the potential to destabilize the precarious balance of interests vis-à-vis China in particular. The renewed focus on rallying against China reflects the shifting balance of power. In sum, QUAD is an initiative that has the potential to threaten China’s hegemony in the region so long as its members manage to act in unison.
*Photograph: The leaders of QUAD countries - Source: Nikkei Asia
 Sumitha Narayanan Kutty and Rajesh Basrur, “The Quad: What It Is – And What It Is Not: The Quad is no Asian NATO and that may be its greatest strength”, The Diplomat, March 24,2021, https://thediplomat.com/2021/03/the-quad-what-it-is-and-what-it-is-not/
 Yogesh Joshi, “Will the Quad’s focus on vaccines, rare earths help it win friends in ASEAN?”, South China Morning Report, March 18, 2021, https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3125837/will-quads-focus-vaccines-rare-earths-help-it-win-friends-asean
 James Holmes, “Can the Quad Transform Into an Alliance to Contain China?”, The National Interest, March 21,2021, https://nationalinterest.org/feature/can-quad-transform-alliance-contain-china-180786
 Chas W. Freeman, “Playing at War Games with China”, ChasFreeman.net, February 11,2021, https://chasfreeman.net/playing-war-games-with-china/
 “The Quad: What It Is – And What It Is Not…”
 Arul Louis, “Quad summit got China's attention on commitment to Indo-Pacific: Biden”, Business-Standard, March 26, 2021, https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/quad-summit-got-china-s-attention-on-commitment-to-indo-pacific-biden-121032600093_1.html
 Ian Marlow, “What Is the ‘Quad’ and Should China Fear It?”, Bloomberg, March 26, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-26/what-is-the-quad-and-should-china-fear-it-quicktake
 “Will the Quad’s focus on vaccines, rare earths help it win friends in ASEAN?”
 “Will the Quad’s focus on vaccines, rare earths help it win friends in ASEAN?”
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
THE REFLECTIONS OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR ON ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 11.12.2020
HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE EU-CHINA AGREEMENT ON INVESTMENT
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 08.02.2021
US INTERESTS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 06.07.2021
THE CHINA-IRAN AGREEMENT AND DISCUSSIONS ON ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE SUEZ CANAL
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 20.04.2021
THE IMPORTANCE OF EU-CHINA AGREEMENT FOR TURKEY AND THE UK
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 16.03.2021
TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP TRADE PACT WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES: INCREASED ELBOW ROOM FOR JAPAN IN EAST ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 10.01.2019
ARMENIA ON IRAN’S PATH TO THE GULF
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 12.06.2017
THE CASE OF SENATOR MENENDEZ AND THE NATURE OF GENOCIDE RESOLUTIONS
UNDERSTANDING APRIL 24
GENOCIDE ACCUSATION AS A FORM OF PUNISHMENT
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 31.05.2016
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)