
This is the English translation of a Turkish language article that was originally published by AVİM on 3 October 2024.
The Organization of Turkic States (OTS), which emerged in 2009 under the name of the Cooperation Council of Turkish Speaking States and which acquired its current name in 2021,[1] was established with the aim of developing cooperation among Turkic states and increasing solidarity in many fields, especially in economic, commercial, scientific and technological fields, by using the unity of history, language, and culture in the relevant geography. OTS, which has been working effectively and organizing summits since its establishment, also has affiliated institutions. The International Organization of Turkic Culture (TURKSOY), Turkic Academy, Parliamentary Assembly of Turkic States (TURKPA), Turkish Culture and Heritage Foundation and Turkish Chamber of Commerce and Industry (TTSO) are the five affiliated institutions.[2] These institutions, each of which carries out important cultural, commercial, and scientific works for the Turkic world and the geography in question, have become an important part of the Organization today. OTS includes Azerbaijan, Türkiye, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan as member states, and Hungary, Turkmenistan, and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus as observer states.
The importance of OTS can be understood even more concretely when one considers the geopolitical features of the geography in which it is located and the common language, history, and cultural background of the Organization’s member states. It can be seen from the relevant examples that international organizations are usually formed by the coming together of many different states that have no intangible ties with each other for purely economic, political, commercial, or scientific purposes. The intangible factor that distinguishes OTS from its counterparts, stemming from the unity of culture, language and history, makes it more reliable and stable as a whole. This intangible component, which is beneficial for both member and observer states, can sometimes be unfairly interpreted too broadly. The accusations of Panturkism and Turanism, especially after the geography of Turkic states began to bring forward a cooperative unity, are an example of this broad interpretation.
One of the concepts that is important regarding the existence of OTS is the “Turkic world”. This concept, which was formed through the accumulations that keep the geographies of Central Asia and Türkiye together linguistically, historically, and culturally, constitutes the basis for the claims of Turanism and Panturkism. What the concept of the Turkic world means for OTS and in general is not the de facto unification of the Turkic states, as in, them becoming a single state and pursuing an expansionist policy. On the contrary, the concept of the Turkic world is used to represent the development of cooperation mechanisms by independent and sovereign member states through utilizing their common knowledge in many fields such as trade, energy, education, art, culture, etc. This can be easily understood by looking at the summit declarations and workshops organized by OTS.
The concept of “Turan” used in the context of OTS, rather than a political ideal, refers to the historical ties of peoples who share a common past. In 2024, with the ninth Great Hun Turkic Congress held in Hungary, these historical ties were reinforced and the Turkic world and its traditions were evoked through various activities in the minds of Turkic communities that are considered “fraternal”. The congress included sporting activities and entertainment, and no political implication was made.[3] Indeed, in the history of OTS events and summits, it is not possible to come across the use of the “Turan” concept in a way that implies an expansionist or aggressive ideal.
As mentioned before, the purpose of OTS is to enable Turkic states to form an efficient cooperation mechanism in areas such as politics, economy, migration, art, education, trade, agriculture, and space. It is unfair to view this cooperation mechanism, which is no different from any other international organization except for its intangible feature, as a political union established solely for cynical purposes. Looking at its past and planned activities, there is no activity or statement that gives the impression that OTS will pose a threat to the region or the world. Additionally, the unfair accusations made against an international organization that has been working actively and effectively since 2009 for the welfare of the region are discouraging for communities around in the world who wish to cooperate based on their common experiences.
In conclusion, the Organization of Turkic States is an international organization in terms of its emergence, branches, and activities. This is how the Organization is perceived by the geography in question and the countries in this geography. In the international arena, an international organization that acts in the best interests of countries with a common background in a certain geography can only benefit rather than pose a threat to the world. The claims of Turanism and Panturkism -viewed as political machinations- that are directed against OTS, on the other hand, do not reflect the reality and constitute attempts to undermine the prosperity and unity of the region.
*Image: 21st Century Türkiye Institute
[1] "Organization of Turkic States (OTS)", Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Türkiye, Accessed: 1 October 2024, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turk-konseyi-en.en.mfa
[2] Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı ile İlişkili Kurumlar, Accessed: 1 October 2024, https://www.turkicstates.org/tr/iliskili-kurumlar
[3] “The 9th Great Hun Turkic Congress Started With A Magnificent Ceremony”, TÜRKSOY, 11 August 2024, https://www.turksoy.org/en-US/news/the-9th-great-hun-turkic-congress-started-with-a-magnificent-ceremony-2ibf
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES AND THE CLAIMS OF TURANISM AND PANTURKISM
Selenay Erva YALÇIN 19.12.2024 -
AN EVALUATION OF THE STRATEGIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHINA AND UZBEKISTAN
Selenay Erva YALÇIN 15.03.2024 -
GERMANY'S CONTRADICTORY STANCE ON THE GAZA ISSUE
Selenay Erva YALÇIN 09.07.2024 -
THE EU'S REFUGEE POLICY IN LIGHT OF VON DER LEYEN'S VISIT TO EGYPT AND THE CASE OF RWANDA
Selenay Erva YALÇIN 10.07.2024
-
THE ARMENIAN NARRATIVE ABOUT THE RECENT ESCALATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE NEW TACTIC FOR THE OLD STRATEGY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 14.10.2020 -
THE FUTURE OF THE TURKIC COUNCIL
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 02.03.2021 -
ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Alev KILIÇ 08.10.2012 -
GREECE’S “CHERRY-PICKING” POLICY IN INVOKING THE RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.08.2020 -
MACRON'S UNDERSTANDING OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, BUT SOME HAVE IT MORE THAN OTHERS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 27.10.2020
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"