On 25 February 2016, the German Federal Assembly (Bundestag) held a debate on the draft resolution submitted by the Alliance '90/The Greens Party that characterizes the events of 1915 as genocide. However, the ruling Christian Democratic Union of Germany/Christian Social Union in Bavaria faction and the Social Democratic Party of Germany opposed the draft resolution on the grounds that this would jeopardize Germany’s joints efforts with Turkey on the Syrian refugee crisis. As such, the Alliance '90/The Greens Party chose to withdraw the draft resolution.
The attempt to push this draft resolution through the Federal Assembly was spearheaded by Alliance '90/The Greens co-chair Cem Özdemir, who acts more like a propagandist than a politician in issues related to Turkey. The fact that, on the same day as the debate of the draft resolution, Özdemir met with the Deputy Speaker of the Armenian National Assembly Eduard Sharmazanov, who spewed utter nonsense about Turkey during his speech in Berlin that day, speaks volumes of the mindset Özdemir and where he gets his guidance from.
The Alliance '90/The Greens Party framed their draft resolution with the worn-out clichés of the narrative that portrays the 1915 events as genocide. During the debate, Özdemir stated; “Turkey is distorting its own history, while our goal is to establish the truth. A clear message on the part of Germany could change a lot” and that Germany needed to pass such a resolution to “clear its conscience”. The rest of the German Federal Assembly seemed to agree with Alliance '90/The Greens Party’s approach to this issue, however, they still opposed the draft resolution on the grounds that now was not the time to handle this issue. It was indicated that such move ahead of the EU-Turkey refugee summit would create problems in forging cooperation with Turkey. Based on the debate in the Federal Assembly, it is apparent that Alliance '90/The Greens Party will try to bring back this draft resolution by April of this year.
There are a couple of points regarding the debate that took place in the German Federal Assembly:
1) The fact that the Alliance '90/The Greens Party brought the draft resolution to the Federal Assembly, only to withdraw it when it did not receive the support they desired reveals Alliance '90/The Greens Party’s lack of political foresight. Before even bringing this draft resolution to the attention of the Federal Assembly, Alliance '90/The Greens Party should have taken a look at Germany’s political agenda and the overall political mood in the country.
2) The Alliance '90/The Greens Party move, taken with lack of foresight, has tarnished the German Federal Assembly’s image of having a principled approach to politics. If recognizing the 1915 events as genocide was such a moral obligation, then the German Federal Assembly should have gone ahead with the draft resolution no matter the consequences. The fact the draft resolution was pushed aside for the sake Germany’s practical considerations reveals that, for Germany, the narrative that portrays the 1915 events as genocide is an issue that has more to do with politics than with morality. This simply reinforces the observation that, for countries that have adopted or are considering to adopt resolution on the 1915 events, the dispute over the characterization of 1915 events is a political tool to verbally harass Turkey and to satiate the incessant demands of Turcophobic Armenian lobby groups.
3) The debate on this draft resolution and the draft resolution’s subsequent withdrawal reveals that German politicians are trying to play Turkey for a fool. It is clear that they are withholding the adoption of this resolution until the time when the EU and Turkey agree on a concrete plan on how to handle the refugee crisis. Once such a plan is secured, German politicians will simply bring back this draft resolution and again cause a diplomatic row between Germany and Turkey. Turkey should seriously take German politicians’ mindset on this issue into consideration before making any commitments on future plans of cooperation.
 “Sharmazanov Hails Cem Ozdemir’s Stance on Armenian Genocide Condemnation”, Armenpress, 26.02.2016, http://armenpress.am/eng/news/837433/sharmazanov-hails-cem-ozdemir%E2%80%99s-stance-on-armenian-genocide-condemnation.html
 Siranush Ghazanchyan, “Bundestag to vote on new Armenian Genocide bill before April 24”, Public Radio of Armenia, 25.02.2016, http://www.armradio.am/en/2016/02/25/bundestag-to-vote-on-new-armenian-genocide-bill-before-april-24/
 Georgi Gotev, “EU and Turkey to hold refugee summit in March”, Euractive.com, 19.02.2016, http://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/eu-and-turkey-to-hold-special-refugee-summit-in-march/
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
RELIGION AND DOUBLE STANDARDS
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 20.04.2016
ANTI-TURKEY AND ANTI-TURKISH VIEWS EXPRESSED AT A CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY THE LSE TURKISH CHAIR
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 28.05.2015
A POSITIVE SHIFT IN THE VATICAN’S HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 04.02.2016
TURKISH-ARMENIAN CONTROVERSY CONTINUES TO BE INSTRUMENTAL FOR THE CHURCH TO INCITE RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC ANIMOSITY
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 21.06.2015
POPE FRANCIS’ OFFICIAL VISIT TO ARMENIA
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 21.06.2016
SMEAR CAMPAIGN AND HATE SPEECH AGAINST TURKEY AND TURKS BY RACIST ARMENIAN NATIONALISTS IN LOS ANGELES CONTINUES
ECONOMIC FORECASTS AND POLITICAL REFLECTIONS IN THE NEW YEAR
Alev KILIÇ 09.01.2013
THE HUMANITARIAN APPROACH AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE IDENTITY OF THE ROHINGYA SHOULD NOT BE SEPARABLE
AN OBJECTION FROM FRANCE: YVES BENARD
Tutku DİLAVER 26.12.2017
CATHOLICOS KAREKIN II-PATRIARCH MANOUGIAN DISPUTE, AND THE 2015 ENCYCLICAL
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 13.01.2015
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)