Armenian-American bilingual daily newspaper Asbarez and The Armenian Mirror-Spectator (a weekly printed in the United States) published the full text of the Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s speech at the Paris Peace Panel that took place last November following the event marking the centennial of the World War I Armistice. 
Pashinyan in his speech mainly deals with the 1915 events and repeats the distorted Armenian arguments that designate the said events as genocide. He also indirectly refers to Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In this context, after stating that “the right of the peoples to self-determination was set out in Wilson’s 14 points”, he brings to the fore “the decades-long struggle of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to determine their destiny.”
Per the said reports, after his speech Pashinyan presented an illustrated book by historian Hayk Demoyan entitled “The Armenian Genocide: Front Page Coverage in the World Media” to be included in the Peace Library as Armenia’s contribution.
Nikol Pashinyan has made the following statement not warranted by facts or evidence “It was during World War One that the Allied powers, for the first time ever, used the definition “crimes against humanity and civilization,” thus condemning the Ottoman rulers for the extermination of 1,5 million Armenians. Later, this horrendous crime was to be termed the first genocide of the 20th century.”
First part of the above-mentioned sentence regarding the “crimes against humanity and civilization” seems to be inspired by the web page of the “United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and Responsibility to Protect” concerning the term “crimes against humanity” which reads as follows:
“The term appears to have been applied for the first time formally at the international level in 1915 by the Allied governments (France, Great Britain and Russia) when issuing a declaration condemning the mass killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.”
As to the content of the Pashinyan’s above quoted sentence, three points should be mentioned. Firstly, he is twisting the term “crimes against humanity” and instead is using the terminology of “crimes against humanity and civilization”.
Secondly, he, without indicating any source, claims that the “definition “for his version (crimes against humanity and civilization) was first used by the Allied Powers during the World War One. Most probably he uses this term based on the information contained in the International Crimes Database (ICD) website, hosted and maintained by the T.M.C. Asser Instituut in The Hague. The said web site states that “the phrase ‘crimes against humanity’ was first employed internationally in a 1915 declaration by the governments of Great Britain, France and Russia” It produces also the copy of the so-called “1915 declaration”. However, the document, produced by the web site is a copy of a “telegram” by the US Department of State to the US Embassy in Ottoman Empire and cannot be considered as a declaration by Allied Powers. In addition, the authenticity of the document is in question in view of the fake documents circulated concerning the 1915 events. Hence, in view of the foregoing there is a need to challenge the reference included in “The Office on Genocide Prevention” and the Responsibility to Protect web page quoted above.
Thirdly, Pashinyan fails to refer to the extermination campaign conducted by the Imperial Germany between the years 1904-1908 against Herero and Nama people in lands belonging to today’s Namibia. As is known, an extermination order was issued against the Herero and Nama tribes that had rebelled against the German colonial administration and these tribes were subjected to a systematic extermination campaign. The people of Namibia today characterize these events as genocide. However, this omission is justifiable since, the term genocide has come into being in 1948 with the UN and genocide can be attributed only the competent courts outlined by the 1948 Genocide Convention.
Another striking point in Pashinyan’ s speech is that he fails to mention Srebrenitsa genocide committed in Bosnia-Herzegovina against Bosniaks. He mentions in this respect “the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the genocides of the Christians and Yezidis in the Middle East, the violence against the Rohingya people.” Nikol Pashinyan should remember that The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague has ruled that the mass killings in Srebrenica in 1995 constitute a genocide.
The speech delivered by Nikol Pashinyan in the Paris Peace Panel is an unfortunate reminder that despite his prouncements for change and a righteous path he maintains the aging Armenian misleading arguments and baseless claims regarding the 1915 events.
 “In Solemn Paris Ceremony, Macron Leads Armistice Commemorations,” Mirror Spectator, December 17, 2018; “Pashinyan Hightlights Armenian Genocide, Wilson’s ’14 Points’ in Address at Armistice Event,” Asbarez, November 12, 2018, http://asbarez.com/176150/pashinyan-hightlights-armenian-genocide-wilsons-14-points-in-address-at-armistice-event/.
 “Crimes Against Humanity,” United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention And The Responsibility To Protect, accessed December 17, 2018, http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/crimes-against-humanity.html.
 “International Crimes Database,” Crimes against humanity, n.d., accessed December 17, 2018.
 Mehmet Oğuzhan Tulun, “Germany’s Test With Genocide,” Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM), December 17, 2017, https://avim.org.tr/Blog/GERMANY-S-TEST-WITH-GENOCIDE-HURRIYET-DAILY-NEWS-17-11-2017.
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
DASHNAK FEDAIS: HEROES OR CALAMITIES OF THE ARMENIAN PEOPLE?
ARMENIAN JOURNEY FROM “OPERATION NEMESIS”, ASALA MURDERS AND KHOJALY MASSACRE TO PRESENT DAY “ARMENOPHOBIA” FABRICATION
ARMENIA’S DESPERATE SEARCH FOR FOREIGN INTERVENTION AND ITS HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS: “THREADS OF CONTINUITY”
EU'S INCORRIGIBLE BIAS AND ANTAGONISM AGAINST TURKEY HAS BEEN REVEALED
CHAPTER BY CHAPTER SYNOPSIS AND REVIEW OF TURKS AND ARMENIANS: NATIONALISM AND CONFLICT IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE BY JUSTIN MCCARTHY - 6
THE SPECTER OF RENEWED ARMED CONFLICTS IN THE BALKANS
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 14.02.2017
THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH ISSUE FROM A JURIDICAL POINT OF VIEW: THE CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS V. ARMENIA
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 26.06.2015
EU’S CENTRAL ASIA STRATEGY 2019: BELATED AND SELF CENTERED
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 11.07.2019
DISGUISED INITIATIVES ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH IN EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 20.02.2018
SYRIAN REFUGEE ISSUE: EU INSENSITIVITY VERSUS UK REALISM
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.03.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)