
It has been ten years since the editor-in-chief of Agos Newspaper Hrant Dink lost his life in a heinous attack.
As an Anatolian intellectual, Hrant Dink believed that the only way to overcome the dispute between Turks and Armenians is direct dialogue between these two sides. For Dink, maybe the most crucial reason for the dispute between Turks and Armenians was the existence of the close bond between them. Dink also believed that for the healing of that bond between Turks and Armenians, which has been ruptured because of having fallen victim to the political discourse surrounding 1915 events, the dialogue between the two sides should not be made dependent on the recognition of genocide by a French, a German, an American or especially a Turk. He did not want Armenians’ problems of the past history or of today to be reduced to a capital or, frequently, to a meze [aperitif] for others to use or profit from in Europe, or in the Americas, nor did he accept the despicable mediation of disinterested third parties. Dink was a believer in the ability of Turks and Armenians to freely speak of that [their] history while never invoking a dispute from it. Dink’s most important legacy has been this highly valuable perspective.
AVİM holds the conviction that discourses that are dictated by third countries and by those who feed from the pains of the past should be left aside to pave the way for the establishment of a fair and common future without being held captive by the common painful past.
Unfortunately, Hrant Dink’s novel way of thinking has already begun to be forgotten ten years after his passing, his thought legacy has fallen victim to this unhealthy psychological trauma that gnaws and consumes Armenian identity, and has been forced to become dependent and needy on third parties’ support. This legacy is especially being ignored by certain circles who hide behind Dink’s name. Instead of following in the footsteps of Dink and becoming facilitators of a fair dialogue between Turks and Armenians free from distorted discourses imposed by the third parties, these circles have become followers and supporters of anti-Turkish discourses of foreign origin. We know that had Hrant Dink’s legacy not been exploited, the year 2015 could have become a unique opportunity for a hopeful future for Turks and Armenians instead of the meaningless taboo it came to be.
© 2009-2020 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
RESOLUTIONS ON 1915 CAME ONE AFTER ANOTHER FROM U.S. SENATE
AVİM 30.12.2019 -
COMMEMORATIVE STAMPS FOR GULBENKIAN
AVİM 19.04.2019 -
THE INDEPENDENT LETS FISK TO ABUSE HISTORICAL FACTS AGAIN
AVİM 27.12.2018 -
ACADEMIC DEBATE V. CHEAP SLANDER
AVİM 24.06.2015 -
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CHANGE OF GUARD AT CENTER FOR EURASIAN STUDIES (AVIM)
AVİM 02.01.2013
-
THERE MAY BE HOPE: LET’S BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE RESOLUTION OF THE TURKISH-ARMENIAN CONTROVERSY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 24.02.2016 -
DOUBLE STANDARDS IN EU HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUE WITH CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES RELEVANT TO ARMENIA
AVİM 16.04.2019 -
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND ITS RESOLUTION ON THE 2015 PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 20.04.2016 -
ARMENIAN ECONOMY NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO FISH NOT CHARITIES FROM DIASPORA
AVİM 12.10.2018 -
MATRYR DIPLOMATS
AVİM 12.04.2015
-
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BOOK PRESENTATION - PHASE LINE ATTILA, THE AMPHIBIOUS CAMPAIGN FOR CYPRUS, 1974