The U.S. state of Indiana has unfortunately become another entity that has decided to involve itself in the historical debate surrounding the events of 1915. Like every other US state before it, Indiana’s decision to involve itself in this debate was not out of a desire facilitate establishment of historical facts to serve reconciliation, but rather to serve political interests.
The political nature of the Indiana’s decision to portray the events of 1915 as genocide and how historical truth was sacrificed by such a decision can easily be seen by looking at the declaration of the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA). After Governor of Indiana Eric J. Holcomb signed the declaration regarding the events of 1915, ANC of Indiana Chairperson Seda Arzumanyan made the made the following declaration:
“The Armenian community in Indiana is small, but mighty… Armenians have called Indiana home for several generations and have made noteworthy contributions to the development of our great state. We are glad to see the Hoosier State join the rest of the nation in properly memorializing and condemning this horrific atrocity and look forward to celebrating our culture and heritage with our fellow Indianans during the week of November 6-12 and beyond.”
There are five issues in this declaration which should not be overlooked.
The first issue here is that for organizations such as ANCA, their of actions are all about ensuring the alienation of a certain group of people (in this case, people of Turkish descent). More specifically, such actions are not about reconciliation between the Turkish and Armenian communities. Diaspora Armenian organizations such as ANCA are not interested in rapprochement between Armenians and Turks. Rather, they are interested in exacting vengeance from and generating hate towards people of Turkish descent. Analyzing the discourse put forth, diaspora Armenian organizations clearly demonstrate their Turcophobic mindsets that oftentimes go so far as to justify terrorism (one would be hard pressed to find any diaspora Armenian organization condemning the acts of terrorism perpetrated against Turkish diplomats by ASALA and JCAG).
Secondly, the anti-Turkish Armenian discourse voiced by such organizations as ANCA would like to bury the historical events of 1915 under a pile of political rubble. More specifically, they would like to ensure the actual details of tragic historical events of 1915 are not discussed in scholarly manner. They cannot let the historians or scholars deal with the facts surrounding the events of 1915, because allowing them to do so would reveal the shady politics to which the debate about the events of 1915 is subjected to. As they have stated at the beginning of their statement, they wanted to prove their “might”.
Thirdly, as ANCA so accurately implies and states in its statement, this recognition is not about history or truth. It is about the identity of the Armenian diaspora. After this declaration, as ANCA has stated, the Armenian diaspora has proven how “mighty” it is. Why would a diaspora community, need to prove it is might? It is actually very simple. As with other Armenian diaspora communities, concerned with integration and assimilation to the main stream, the Indiana community is using this and other types of proclamations as a way to define its identity.
Fourthly, the Proclamation signed by the Governor of Indiana states the following:
“WHEREAS, from 1915-1923 during the Armenian Genocide, one and one-half million ethnic Armenian men, women and children as well as over one million Greeks, Assyrians, Syriacs and others were massacred as part of the planned complete eradication of those indigenous communities by the Ottoman Turkish Empire during the first modern genocide that still requires justice; and…”.
Here, the most important part seems that the proclamation seems to deal with multiple nations. Specifically it seems to deal with “Armenian, Greeks, Assyrians, Syriacs” populations in the Ottoman Empire. Then it carelessly uses the words “and others”. Why are individuals whose members died in the years the of the First World War less valued compared to Armenian, Greeks, Assyrians and Syriacs? More specifically, why hasn’t State of Indiana and its Governor did not mention the Muslim population which perished in Anatolia. Why didn’t the proclamation mention any Turks that have died during the conflict of 1915? Are Turks, as a nation less valued then Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians or Syriacs?
Fifthly, apparently the Proclamation has been made against the “Ottoman Turkish government’s crimes”. Furthermore, apparently, the actions of the Ottoman Empire “still requires justice.” However, the State of Indiana and its Governor have forgotten something major. What about the crimes committed by the Armenians gangs and revolutionaries before and during the events of 1915? What about the murders they have committed against Ottoman Muslims? Why does Proclamation fail mention the crimes they have committed? Is it because mentioning such crimes would automatically force third-party people to question their assumptions regarding the events of 1915 and how Armenians are portrayed purely as the victims and Turks are portrayed purely as the perpetrators? Or is it because the life and death of Turks and Muslims are not worth mentioning?
May be the words of Harut Sassounian, a notorious Armenian American journalist known for his deep-seated hostility towards anything Turkey and Turkish, best explains the proclamation made by the State of Indiana and signed by its Governor. In one relevant article, he writes that “recognition of Armenian genocide by states has a propaganda meaning, it can be beneficial from this perspective”. It should never be forgotten that historical truth and furthermore step for reconciliation should not be sacrificed to propaganda.
 “Indiana Becomes 48th U.S. State to Recognize the Armenian Genocide,” Armenian National Committee of America, November 6, 2017, https://anca.org/indiana-becomes-48th-u-s-state-to-recognize-the-armenian-genocide/.
 “Indiana Becomes 48th U.S. State to Recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
 “Indiana Becomes 48th State to Recognize the Armenian Genocide,” The Armenian Weekly, November 6, 2017, sec. Headline, https://armenianweekly.com/2017/11/06/indiana-becomes-48th-state-recognize-armenian-genocide/.
 “Indiana Becomes 48th State to Recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
 “Indiana Becomes 48th U.S. State to Recognize the Armenian Genocide.”
 “Recognition of Amernian Genocide by U.S. State of Indiana Is Moral and Propaganda Benefit - Harut Sassounian,” ArmenPress, November 7, 2017, https://armenpress.am/eng/news/911587/recognition-of-armenian-genocide-by-us-state-of-indiana-is-moral-and-propaganda-benefit---harut-sassounian.html.
© 2009-2019 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
THE BILL OFFERED BY ARMENIAN LOBBIES TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS AGAINST TURKEY IN CALIFORNIA WAS DENIED BY THE GOVERNOR
CONCERNS OVER THE PATRIARCH ELECTION
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
EXCERPTS FROM JEREMY SALT’S BOOK REVIEW TITLED “A LAWYER’S BLUNDERING FORAY INTO HISTORY” IN THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE REVIEW OF ARMENIAN STUDIES
AVİM HELD A MEETING ENTITLED “TURKISH-ARMENIAN QUESTION: IN THE LIGHT OF THE HEARING OF PERINÇEK v. SWITZERLAND CASE ON JANUARY 28TH”
OIC COUNCIL OF FOREIGN MINISTERS 43RD SESSION HELD IN UZBEKISTAN
Özge Nur ÖĞÜTCÜ 02.11.2016
THE CENTENNIAL OF THE BALKAN WARS
Alev KILIÇ 16.10.2012
PRESIDENT OBAMA’S 24 APRIL STATEMENT
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 26.04.2013
PROMINENT SUPPORTER OF ARMENIAN LOBBIES IN FRANCE SENTENCED FOR CORRUPTION
Maxime GAUIN 22.10.2015
INCOHORENCE OF THE WEST: ASSERTING A CLAIM OF GENOCIDE WITHOUT QUESTIONING THEMSELVES
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
THE CENTENNIAL OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE THREE SOUTH CAUCASUS STATES: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY
“EURASIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TURKEY AND MONGOLIA”
SECURITY, STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE WIDER BLACK SEA REGION