
29.04.2015
Alev Kılıç
It is principally, scientifically and ethically not possible to accept the one-sided Armenian version of history accusing every other opinion as denialism and even of complicity in the “crime”. As it is well known, Turkey objects three substantial elements of the Armenian allegations:
1) Presentation of the events during the First World War as genocide,
2) The numbers game and the multiplication on the number of the Armenian casualties with a view to further dramatizing the wartime losses,
3) Denial of the sufferings of the Turks at the hands of the Armenians during the revolts and conflicts prior to the war and later in collaboration with the Tsarist Russian army in the east and the French army in the south.
During the period when Turkey remained silent and aloof against the Armenian allegations, the propaganda of the one-sided Armenian narrative continued systematically on the pillars of history, law and political support. Western countries which lent their support to Armenians during the First World War and public opinions that could be influenced by the Armenian diaspora were prioritized to enlist political support.
Although being late to take action, Turkey was able to respond to historical and legal claims put forth by the Armenians. Today, it is possible to say that the historical and legal arguments of the Armenian allegations have lost their credibility and efficiency. Conversely, political support is still strong. However, the Armenian side, cognizant of the limits of political support alone, to balance this emerging deficiency, has brought openly into the scene the common denominator of religion, lurking in the background until recently, exploiting the rising islamophobia nowadays, and exerting every effort to transform this into turcophobia.
It is not likely for Turkey to win over the Western public opinion. A major achievement would be to neutralize the current perception. To regard this situation as a failure or to incongruously question one’s own past is neither the solution nor appropriate. The participation of the Russian and French presidents in the April 24th ceremonies held in Yerevan is a reminder and warning that we should be thankful of, as it clearly showed how historical bonds and animosity against the Turkish people one hundred years ago is reflected to the present. As it is historically documented, during the First World War, Ottoman Armenians joined the Tsarist Russian army which invaded Eastern Anatolia and the French army which invaded Southeastern Anatolia wearing their uniforms and committing atrocities against the Turks and Muslims that even disturbed the commanders of the armies which they joined. Today, these two countries, instead of repenting for the events that they were a part of, still appear to be the proponents of old scores. There could be no better indicator than this to show what Turkey is facing with.
The potential consequences of the blatant inclusion of religion into historical-political controversy is saddening and forecasts a premonition for a bleak future in international relations. Being a sincere proponent of interfaith dialogue and standard bearer of inter-civilizational cooperation, Turkey’s disapproval and strong opposition to the discourse of seeking assistance to a historical and political controversy by converting it to a Christian-Muslim conflict needs recognition as a contemporary and civilized approach and should be duly acknowledged.
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
TURKEY AND THE NEW CONFIGURATIONS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Alev KILIÇ 20.09.2013 -
THE TRANS-ADRIATIC NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (TAP)
Alev KILIÇ 05.10.2012 -
TAIWAN (REPUBLIC OF CHINA) COULD BE SIGNIFICANT IN TURKEY’S OPENING TO ASIA.
Alev KILIÇ 07.11.2013 -
FORTRESS EUROPE CLOSES RANKS
Alev KILIÇ 21.02.2013 -
THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CAUCASUS
Alev KILIÇ 06.12.2012
-
POPE FRANCIS IN AZERBAIJAN
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 14.10.2016 -
MURAD OF SEBASTIA (SIVAS) - A LESSER KNOWN ARMENIAN FEDAYEE MOSTLY PORTRAYED BY A FEW, HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE SOURCES
Ahmet Can ÖKTEM 29.04.2022 -
COMMEMORATION OF OUR MARTYR DIPLOMATS
Oya EREN ÖZER 15.02.2012 -
INCOHORENCE OF THE WEST: ASSERTING A CLAIM OF GENOCIDE WITHOUT QUESTIONING THEMSELVES
AVİM 30.12.2019 -
THE EUROPEAN UNION'S SHAMEFUL CAMPS CONTINUE TO EXIST DESPITE THE FIRE DISASTER
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 30.09.2020
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"