Ömer Engin LÜTEM
The message of President Erdoğan, which was released yesterday on the events of 1915, has, in brief, mentioned that it is a humane responsibility to share and understand the memories of Armenians’ pains of the First World War, that the events which occurred during this war constituted a shared pain, and that the relocation had inhumane consequences. The Prime minister wished that the Armenians who lost their lives rest in peace and conveyed his condolences to their grandchildren.
Thus, it was the first time in the history of Republic of Turkey that a Prime Minister has showed a humane attitude that understands and shares the pains of Armenians.
Moreover, it is observed that Turkey has preserved its conventional stance towards the Armenian issue. Firstly, despite the expectations of militant Armenians, there is no sign in the message that Turkey has recognized the genocide claims. In addition, the Prime Minister has repeated the calls made in 2005 for setting up of a joint historical commission in order to study the events of 1915 in a scholarly manner, which was refused by the Armenians.
In addition to this, it has been mentioned in the message that either the Diaspora or certain groups in the Diaspora have used some tactics that have prevented the establishment of normal relations between the two countries and the two nations, such as using the events of 1915 as an excuse for hostility against Turkey and turning this issue into a matter of political conflict, deriving enmity from history and creating new antagonisms.
Reactions by Armenia and the Diaspora to the Prime Minister’s message are negative. Yet, the message has not referred, even allusively, to the matters demanded by Armenia from Turkey such as recognition of the genocide allegations, compensation, returning of possessions and, if possible, transfer of some territory from Turkey to Armenia. On the other hand, immediate reactions by the US and the EU are positive. Turkey’s humane perspective for the Armenian issue seems to have collected some admiration.
It might cause isolation for Armenia and the Diaspora in the future that they have adopted a different stance than other countries and that they have continued to portray an irreconcilable approach. In this stage, it is possible to state that this message has started a new era for Turkish-Armenian relations.
© 2009-2018 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
FRANCE AND THE ARMENIAN QUESTION
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 04.02.2014
IS IT REALLY A SUCCESS?
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 05.03.2010
THE PROTOCOLS: A RETURN TO THE BEGINNING
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 20.01.2010
YEREVAN IS CRITIZING TURKEY (2)
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 20.06.2010
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AFTER THE HOLIDAYS II
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 05.09.2011
ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Alev KILIÇ 08.10.2012
THE BALKANS – EU – TURKEY
Alev KILIÇ 03.10.2012
SWEDEN BACKTRACKS ON RECOGNITION OF THE KILLINGS OF ARMENIANS, ASSYRIANS/SYRIACS/CHALDEANS AND PONTIC GREEKS AS GENOCIDE
Cemre Dilay BOZTEPE 17.05.2015
THE WAY OUT TO TURKISH-ARMENIAN RECONCILIATION COULD BE MUTUAL FORGIVENESS
Alev KILIÇ 11.11.2012
THE SO-CALLED 'ELECTIONS' IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 04.10.2015
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)