The act of erecting a wall between Turkey and Western Europe has started in Greece through EU funds. According to the information provided by European agencies, 10.5 kilometers of the 4 meter tall razor wire fence drawn along the Maritsa River on the Turkish-Greece border has been completed to the cost of 3 million Euros. Thus, the Schengen regulations have taken a concrete and visible shape and Europe is on its way to separation with a new curtain.
The razor wire fence on the Turkish-Greece border is symbolic at this stage. It has brought in a concrete and ugly perspective to a well known understanding and approach. It will not be surprising for it to be extended further in the future. The political footsteps of this approach go all the way back to the policy and initiative of alienating Turkey in the Balkans. Western Europe has never in its history been pleased with the Balkan concept. This depiction evoking Turkish presence and Turkish dominance in the region has formed a sufficient justification to disparage the term. The word Balkan is Turkish. Turkish tribes, who have compared the Balkan Mountains and Balkan geography to the regions they lived in before, have given this name and the region has been identified with this name for centuries.
The definition which the EU has adopted and is trying to impose today is Southeastern Europe. The term, Western Balkans, the geographical concept used for those Balkan countries not yet admitted to enter the EU, is bound to be removed from circulation when the EU membership process is realized. Since a definition for Eastern Balkans does not exist and the border to the east is drawn with Romania, Bulgaria and Greece, Turkey is designed to be alienated from the Balkans in political literature and as such, from Europe.
Turkey has traditionally attached importance and priority to good neighborly relations and cooperation in the Balkans, has also played an active and leading role in the establishment and institutionalization of the “Southeast European Cooperation Process”. The emergence of organizations and institutions with varying memberships, within the scope of Southeast Europe whose numbers and functions are gradually increasing, have inevitably led to Turkey’s presence in the region to be watered down. Greece’s attempts to provide a place for the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus in the region and Slavic countries establishing new formations have also not contributed to regional solidarity.
Turkey’s alienation from the Balkans, in its quest for membership, receiving a cold shoulder from the EU, its European identity and membership of the European family put into question are elements prone to conjure the memories and conditions before the First World War. During that period, the Ottoman administration had first sought cooperation with the allied powers and had made serious inquiries with the major allied powers, France and the UK, but was rather pushed to the other camp by the allies who contemplated the spoils of war as Ottoman territories and were already plotting how to share them. Of course, conditions have changed. Turkey is no longer Europe’s sick man. It has learned its lessons from history and has determined its position with the Treaty of Lausanne.
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THE MINSK GROUP’S REGIONAL VISIT IS IN PROGRESS
Alev KILIÇ 26.11.2012 -
THE MOSCOW SUMMIT OF THE COLLECTIVE SECURITY TREATY ORGANIZATION
Alev KILIÇ 24.12.2012 -
MEXICO AND THE ARMENIAN DILEMMA
Alev KILIÇ 01.11.2012 -
TURKEY AND THE NEW CONFIGURATIONS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Alev KILIÇ 20.09.2013 -
CAN THE EUROPEAN UNION’S EURO CRISIS BE RESOLVED
Alev KILIÇ 13.11.2012
-
UNDERSTANDING NAGORNO-KARABAKH DESPITE THE BIASED MANNER OF THE WESTERN MEDIA
Tutku DİLAVER 21.01.2021 -
THE CZECH REPUBLIC PRESIDENT HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE WAVE OF POPULISM
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 23.10.2017 -
OLD INSURANCE POLICIES
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 20.12.2010 -
COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CENTER FOR EURASIAN STUDIES AND THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF NATIONAL CHENG-CHI UNIVERSITY (NCCU) OF TAIWAN
AVİM 21.10.2013 -
THE PROBLEM OF BIASED INTERNATIONAL NEWS AGENCIES
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 17.03.2017
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER -
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
-
THE SEARCH FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR: VIEWS FROM GEORGIA AND TURKEY