
The Independent (16 December 2018)
Serbia has threatened military action against neighbouring Kosovo after its parliament approved the creation of a new army.
Kosovar MPs voted on Friday to expand the existing Kosovo Security Force into a 5,000-troop army, plus 3,000 reservists.
Belgrade called the move a “direct threat to peace and stability” in the Balkans and lashed out at the United States for supporting the proposal.
Kosovo unilaterally declared independence in 2008, but Serbia does not recognise its former province as a state.
Belgrade insists the new army would violate a UN resolution that brought to an end its bloody crackdown on ethnic Albanian separatists in 1999.
Serbian prime minister Ana Brnabic said armed intervention was “one of the options on the table”.
All 107 MPs present in the 120-seat parliament in Pristina voted in favour of passing three draft laws to expand the existing security force, created mainly for crisis response, civil defence and removal of land mines following the 1990s conflict.
Kosovo’s constitution mandates the creation of a national army but no action had been taken for years, while Pristina sought in vain to win the approval of Kosovar Serbs.
Ethnic Serb politicians in Kosovo boycotted Friday’s vote, described as “ill-timed” by Nato’s secretary general.
“I regret that this decision was made despite the concerns expressed by Nato,” said Jens Stoltenberg, warning it could destabilise a region where efforts to ease tensions have been ongoing for decades.
He added: “The North Atlantic Council will now have to re-examine the level of Nato’s engagement with the Kosovo Security Force.”
But the US called the new army “historic” and said it supported “Kosovo’s sovereign right” to maintain forces.
Kosovo’s prime minister Ramush Haradinaj said the new army “will never be used against” Serbia.
He added: “Serbia’s army will now have a partner – Kosovo’s army – in the partnership for peace process.”
But Belgrade fears the army could be used to chase the Serbs out of Kosovo’s north, a claim strongly denied by the government in Pristina.
On Friday, Nikola Selakovic, an adviser to the Serbian president, said his country could send in troops or declare Kosovo an occupied territory. Belgrade’s foreign minister Ivica Dacic said Serbia would seek an urgent session of the UN Security Council about the issue.
President Aleksandar Vucic who visited his country’s troops near the border with Kosovo on Friday, later addressed the nation, denouncing the US for its apparent support of a Kosovar army and praising allies Russia and China for their opposition to the move.
He claimed Kosovo and its “sponsor” – the US – wanted to “quash” the Serbs.
Mr Vucic said Serbia had been “brought to the edge” by Kosovo’s decision and now had no choice but to “defend” itself.
Antonio Guterres, UN secretary general, called on “all parties concerned to exercise restraint and refrain from actions that could raise tensions”.
Any Serbian armed intervention in Kosovo would mean a direct confrontation with thousands of Nato-led peacekeepers, including US soldiers, who have been stationed in Kosovo since 1999.
Balkans analysts, however, said any action by Serbia’s 28,000-strong army against Kosovo was highly unlikely given Belgrade’s aspirations to join the EU.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/kosovo-army-security-force-serbia-military-action-invasion-ana-brnabic-a8684861.html
No comments yet.
- ARMENIAN COURT DENIES MOTION FOR ARREST OF FORMER DEPUTY PM The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 17.12.2018
- ROMANIA PARTY BOSS CALLS RIVAL’S COMMENT ON EU POST TREASON The Balkans 17.12.2018
- AZERBAIJAN, KAZAKHSTAN HAVE SOLID POTENTIAL FOR FURTHER COOPERATION The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 17.12.2018
- KARABAKH ARMY CHIEF SACKED The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 17.12.2018
-
SERBIA THREATENS MILITARY ACTION AFTER KOSOVO VOTES TO CREATE ARMY
The Balkans
17.12.2018
-
25.01.2016
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
12.06.2024
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
27.03.2023
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
17.03.2023
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
23.02.2023
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
03.02.2023
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
16.12.2022
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
07.12.2022
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
07.12.2022
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
01.01.2022
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
01.01.2022
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
03.06.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
08.04.2020
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
12.06.2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
02.12.2016
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
01.07.2016
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
10.03.2016
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
24.01.2016
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
AVİM Conference Hall 24.01.2023
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"
