With its Parliament adopting a resolution yesterday (March 11), Sweden became the 20th country to recognize the Armenian genocide allegations. The Swedish Government opposed the resolution. The Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Commission had submitted the resolution to the General Assembly with the view that it should not be adopted. However, the resolution was adopted with a one vote difference. It should immediately be noted that this resolution is not binding. In other words, it does not create any legal consequences for neither Turkey nor Sweden. Therefore, this resolution has no further effect other than merely reflecting the views of the members of parliament who have voted in favor of it. However, this resolution will further strengthen the existing belief, especially in Western countries, that the Armenians have been subjected to genocide in 1915. Even though the resolution has no consequence or effect, it can be seen that it entails much more extreme positions when compared to the resolutions adopted by other parliaments regarding this subject. First of all, it puts forth that not only Armenians, but also Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans and Pontus Romans have also been subjected to genocide in the Ottoman Empire. No other parliament has alleged that genocide has been inflicted upon these five ethnic groups. Secondly, in the resolution, it is requested from the Swedish Government to take initiatives in order to persuade Turkey in accepting the “genocide” conducted towards Armenians, Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, and Pontus Romans. This provision has also not been put forth by any of the other parliaments. Last of all, in the resolution it is also required from the Swedish Government to take initiatives within the European Union and United Nations so that Turkey will accept that “genocide” has been inflicted upon the five ethnic groups. This is also a first. Minister of Swedish Foreign Affairs Carl Bildt has opposed the resolution, stating that historical events should not be judged at political level, but should be left to the relating parties to discuss it, while also saying that the resolution has been adopted despite the view of the Parliamentary Committee of Foreign Affairs and that it has failed to be adopted unanimously. This way, the Minister has wanted to convey that the resolution carries no great importance. Moreover, he has also emphasized that this resolution will not contribute positively to the ongoing process of normalizing relations between Turkey and Armenia. It can be said that the Swedish Government is not pleased with the resolution adopted by the Parliament with only one vote difference and although it has not been openly expressed, it can be seen that there is concern that the cooperation between Turkey and Sweden which has greatly developed in the recent years will be damaged. Turkey’s reaction to the resolution has been quick and strong. Prime Minister Erdoğan has cancelled his visit to Sweden which was to take place next week, and Turkey’s Ambassador to Stockholm Zergün Korutürk has been recalled to Ankara for consultations. However, since the Swedish Government is also against the resolution, it can be expected that relations between the two countries will soon turn back to normal again.
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THE PROTOCOLS: A RETURN TO THE BEGINNING
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 20.01.2010 -
BULGARIA’S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 06.01.2010 -
PRESIDENT OBAMA’S 24 APRIL STATEMENT - Ömer Engin LÜTEM
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 25.04.2012 -
PRESIDENT SARKISIAN AND TURKEY
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 21.01.2012 -
BULGARIA’S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION (II)
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 07.01.2010
-
VENEZUELAN CONGRESS SEEKS PROBE OF OPPOSITION LEADER OVER PROTESTS
Hande Apakan 18.03.2014 -
THE CLAIMS AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SIGNED AT ANKARA, 25 OCTOBER 1934 AND ITS LEGALLY BINDING IMPACT ON COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF US CITIZENS OF ARMENIAN DESCENT
AVİM 14.01.2020 -
THE UKRAINE-RUSSIA WAR AND THE BLACK SEA SECURITY
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 30.05.2023 -
ARMENIA AND THE VENERATION OF TERRORISTS
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 19.05.2015 -
DOES THE G7 SUMMIT PROVE THAT THE WEST CAN “BUILD BETTER"?
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 28.06.2021
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"