EurActiv & AFP (5 July 2017)
The European Commission on Tuesday (4 July) asked Slovenia and Croatia to “implement” a ruling that gave Ljubljana key access to international waters off the Croatian coast, a decision rejected by Zagreb.
“The Commission has taken note of the final decision and is waiting for the two parties to implement it,” First Vice-President Frans Timmermans told a press conference in Strasbourg.
Timmermans “applauded” the fact the two countries are due to meet next week, adding that the willingness of the two prime ministers to discuss the issue “is a good sign”.
“The Commission hopes the prime ministers will find common ground on the best way to implement the decision,” he said.
On Thursday (6 July), an international arbitration court ruled that Slovenia should have uninterrupted access to international waters, allowing “freedom of communication” to all ships seeking access to the country.
Slovenia, which has just 46 kilometres (29 miles) of coastline, had argued its access to international waters was at stake because Croatia, whose coast stretches for 1,700 kilometres, wanted the maritime border to be drawn down the middle of the disputed Piran bay.
The bay is also shared by Croatia, and the dispute over where the sea borders should be drawn has poisoned relations between the neighbours since they both declared independence from Yugoslavia in 1991.
Ljubljana insists it has a historic claim to the entire bay while Zagreb says it owns half of it.
But judges rejected Ljubljana’s claim that the whole of the southwestern Piran Bay on the northern Adriatic Sea was Slovenian territory.
They determined a “junction area” between the Slovenian territorial sea and the international waters it shares with Croatia.
The court said the aim of the corridor was to “guarantee both the integrity of Croatia’s territorial sea and Slovenia’s freedoms of communication between its territory and the high seas”.
‘Good sign’
But immediately after the ruling, Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković said his country will refuse to implement the decision.
In Ljubljana, Slovenian Prime Minister Miro Cerar hailed the ruling as a “historic moment for Slovenia”, saying the judgement “is definitive and must be applied on both countries”.
The decision is largely symbolic for Slovenia because the country is already guaranteed access to international waters under international law even if it doesn’t hold sovereignty over the Piran bay.
Observers have warned that if Zagreb does not comply with the ruling it could further strain already tense relations with Slovenia, which is Croatia’s key entry point into the passport-free Schengen zone.
Incidents have been reported in the disputed area after the ruling.
Slovenia joined the EU in 2004. Croatia followed in 2013. At least in theory, EU rules require new members to join the Union only after having solved disputes with their neighbours.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/eu-urges-croatia-to-implement-piran-bay-ruling/
No comments yet.
- ASTANA,WASHINGTON SIGN FIVE-YEAR PLAN FOR MILITARY COOPERATION Asia - Pacific 05.07.2017
- AZERBAIJAN SHIPS 733,664 TONNES OF OIL VIA RUSSIA IN H1 The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 05.07.2017
- BULGARIA'S NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY PLANS TO USE EUR 3 MILLION IN FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT The Balkans 05.07.2017
- IRAQI SHI'ITE PARAMILITARIES TAKE BAAJ TOWN WEST OF MOSUL FROM ISLAMIC STATE: ARMY Iraq 05.07.2017
-
PRIME MINISTERS OF SLOVENIA AND CROATIA TO MEET ON 12TH OF JULY
The Balkans
05.07.2017
-
25.01.2016
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
12.06.2024
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
27.03.2023
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
17.03.2023
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
23.02.2023
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
03.02.2023
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
16.12.2022
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
07.12.2022
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
07.12.2022
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
01.01.2022
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
01.01.2022
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
03.06.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
08.04.2020
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
12.06.2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
02.12.2016
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
01.07.2016
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
10.03.2016
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
24.01.2016
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
AVİM Conference Hall 24.01.2023
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"
