EurAcyiv (19 March 2019)
European Union leaders could hold off making any final decision on any Brexit delay when they meet in Brussels later this week, senior diplomats in the bloc said, depending on what exactly British Prime Minister Theresa May asks them for.
The senior national diplomats in Brussels spoke on Monday afternoon (18 March) after the UK’s speaker of parliament seemed to have dashed May’s hopes for a third House of Commons vote – which had initially been expected as soon as this week – to approve her stalled divorce deal with the bloc.
Speaker deals blow to May's bid for 3rd 'meaningful vote'
British Prime Minister Theresa May’s bid to get her EU divorce deal through parliament was hit Monday (18 March) with a bombshell announcement by the speaker, ruling MPs could not vote again on the same proposal they had already rejected.
The speaker, John Bercow, said the deal would need to be fundamentally different to qualify for another vote, after parliament rejected the agreement in January and again last week.
As the EU’s Brexit planning was thrown up in the air again, several senior EU diplomats said the leaders’ summit on 21-22 March could chose not to make any firm decisions.
“Now it looks like we have to wait till the week after the Council to find out what happens,” said one diplomat.
With no divorce agreement yet ratified, the UK parliament voted last week for May to seek a delay of the exit date.
Any such delay beyond the current date of midnight (2300 GMT) on 29 March would need to be unanimously backed by all the other 27 EU states staying on together after Brexit and the Thursday-Friday leaders’ summit was seen as the time to do it.
Another senior diplomat said the leaders could decide to skip any final call on any extension of the divorce negotiating time – long or short – unless there is a third vote in the UK by Thursday.
“The summit would not take a final decision but just discuss political parameters and conditions. May would win a few more days. We would decide next week through a written procedure,” a third person said under condition of anonymity.
Sources in the EU’s political hub Brussels said earlier on Monday that Britain could ask for a Brexit delay even after the summit, suggesting that the decisive moment for Brexit might still be some days ahead.
They said that the 27 national leaders would not necessarily need to meet physically to approve any such request, if it came from London, as it could be done through a written procedure.
Extension options
May has said she would seek only a short postponement to prepare the necessary legislation if her deal is endorsed before 29 March, and dangled the prospect that if it is not, the exit from the EU could face a long delay. Many Brexiteers worry such a postponement could lead to Brexit never happening.
The EU is unlikely to refuse an extension, to avoid being blamed for economic disruptions if Britain crashes out of the bloc with no deal in place to mitigate the impact. But leaders have yet to discuss their preference for a short delay – until the end of June – or a longer one until the end of this year, or even 2020.
A document circulated among the 27 EU ambassadors by the bloc’s legal services last Friday said “in principle”, Britain could get more than one extension.
But it said the EU must avoid damaging the legitimacy of the bloc’s new European Parliament, which will convene for the first time on 2 July following 24-26 May elections across the bloc.
“If an initial extension puts the withdrawal date after the date of the European Parliament elections, and if these elections were not organised by the withdrawing state, this would make any further extension impossible,” it said.
Some in the EU worry that Britain could extend until the end of June while eschewing the European elections and then revoke its leave notice, which it could do unilaterally by law, putting the status of the bloc’s new parliament in doubt.
No comments yet.
- POPE FRANCIS TRIP AIMS TO THAW CATHOLIC-ORTHODOX RELATIONS IN ROMANIA The Balkans 19.03.2019
- ECO SECRETARY GENERAL’S OFFICIAL VISIT CONCLUDES Asia - Pacific 19.03.2019
-
TOKYO SAYS JAPAN AND RUSSIA WILL NOT DISCLOSE DETAILS OF PEACE TREATY TALKS
Asia - Pacific
19.03.2019
-
FRENCH DEFENCE MINISTER: ‘IT’S CALLED ARTICLE 5, NOT ARTICLE F-35’
Europe - EU
19.03.2019
- ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR AND BELARUSIAN DEPUTY FM DISCUSS COOPERATION WITHIN UN The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 19.03.2019
-
25.01.2016
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
12.06.2024
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
27.03.2023
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
17.03.2023
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
23.02.2023
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
03.02.2023
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
16.12.2022
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
07.12.2022
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
07.12.2022
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
01.01.2022
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
01.01.2022
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
03.06.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
08.04.2020
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
12.06.2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
02.12.2016
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
01.07.2016
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
10.03.2016
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
24.01.2016
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
AVİM Conference Hall 24.01.2023
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"
