EurActiv (29 July 2019)
Belgium should have carried out environmental impact studies before prolonging the operational life of two nuclear reactors, Europe’s top court ruled Monday (29 July).
The European Court of Justice, responding to a case brought by two environmental pressure groups, found the Belgian government in breach of EU law.
Belgium must now conduct environmental assessments and demonstrate that there is a “genuine and serious threat” of power cuts if the plants are closed.
And, as the Doel 1 and Doel 2 reactors are on a site close to the Dutch border, the Netherlands must be involved in a “transboundary assessment procedure”.
The Belgian constitutional court will now decide the fate of the power stations, taking into account the legal interpretation of the ECJ.
The Belgian parliament decided in 2003 to phase out the use of nuclear energy and to retire its ageing reactors, amid concern from its neighbours.
Doel 1 and 2 were to have shut in 2015 after reaching 40 years in age, but lawmakers decided to prolong their life by ten years to prevent power shortages.
Some 700 million euros were spent refurbishing and modernising the site on the Escaut river never Antwerp to ensure it met safety standards.
But officials did not undertake the same major environmental impact assessment that they would have carried out if they had been opening a new plant.
Green campaigners brought a case and on Monday the ECJ ruled that, under EU law, the Belgian authorities and operator Electrabel should have carried out the study.
They conceded, however, that such a study could still be conducted now to retroactively regularise the project even after the modernisation is complete.
Belgium currently has seven reactors, four at the Doel power station and three in Tihange, in the east of the country between Namur and Liege.
Inspectors have discovered impurities in the metal vessels encasing two of these reactors – Doel 3 and Tihange 2 – leading to calls for their closure.
Electrabel, a subsidiary of French giant Engie, insists that the reactors meet safety standards.
No comments yet.
- EU PARLIAMENT REJECTS OMBUDSMAN OVER EXPENSES Europe - EU 30.07.2019
- THREE QUESTIONS WITH ZOHRAB MNATSAKANYAN, FOREIGN MINISTER OF ARMENIA The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 30.07.2019
- MEETING OF LEADERS OF KYRGYZSTAN, TAJIKISTAN GIVE IMPETUS TO BORDER TALKS – JEENBEKOV’S PRESS SECRETARY Central Asia 30.07.2019
-
SERBIAN RULING PARTY AND OPPOSITION MEET FOR FIRST TIME
The Balkans
30.07.2019
-
OPINION: MORE MONEY WON'T ALONE FIX GERMANY'S MILITARY WOES
Europe - EU
30.07.2019
-
25.01.2016
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
12.06.2024
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
27.03.2023
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
17.03.2023
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
23.02.2023
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
03.02.2023
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
16.12.2022
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
07.12.2022
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
07.12.2022
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
01.01.2022
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
01.01.2022
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
03.06.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
08.04.2020
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
12.06.2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
02.12.2016
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
01.07.2016
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
10.03.2016
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
24.01.2016
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
AVİM Conference Hall 24.01.2023
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"
