MediaMax (27 August 2020)
Director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, member of Council on Foreign and Defense Policy Dmitri Trenin believes that "Armenia is not a fully reliable ally to Russia.”
The political scientist makes that statement in the article “Russia’s alliance policy: What should be done and what should be changed?” which is a review of the book “Allies”.
“Historically, Armenia was Russia’s vanguard toward Near and Middle East. Now, Armenia hosts the 102nd military base of the Russian Armed Forces. However, this vanguard is geographically isolated from Russia; it is a strategic exclave and thus carries the factor of vulnerability. Military presence in Armenia is not particularly valuable for Russia in terms of defense: Russia’s strategic border in the region passes on the Greater Caucasus Mountain Range, with positions in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Neither is Armenia a base for promoting Russia’s interests in the South Caucasus, in Turkish and Iranian directions. The economic value of relations with Armenia is quite low for Russia. The main value of the position in Armenia is the possibility to maintain relative stability in the South Caucasus and the balance between Azerbaijan and Armenia, as well as to restrain Turkey’s ambitions,” writes Trenin.
“For Armenia, on the contrary, allied relations with Russia are vital. In this regard, Russia cannot ignore the feelings of over 1.2 million Armenian Russians. Nevertheless, the Yerevan elite, which is mainly gravitating towards the parts of Diaspora outside of Russia (in USA, France and other countries), is often dismissive to Russia and treats Russia with a consumerist approach.
The change of power that occurred in Armenia in 2018 did not lead to a change in the country’s geopolitical vector: lack of alternative to Russian support is obvious even for those who is not in Russia’s favor. However, Armenia is not a fully reliable ally for Russia now. If the situation does not change in the future, the role of relations with Russia will grow smaller and the nature of ties with Armenia can be reviewed and corrected with damage to Russia’s interests,” concludes Trenin.
No comments yet.
-
DEFENSE MINISTER: TURKEY ALWAYS TO SUPPORT AZERBAIJAN The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 28.08.2020
- UN CONVOY HIT BY EXPLOSION IN NORTHERN IRAQ Iraq 28.08.2020
-
CHINA FIRES 'AIRCRAFT-CARRIER KILLER' MISSILE IN WARNING TO US Asia - Pacific 28.08.2020
-
SAUDI ARABIA’S FOREIGN MINISTER IN BAGHDAD TO SIGN DEALS WITH IRAQ Iraq 28.08.2020
-
SHINZO ABE: JAPAN'S PM RESIGNS FOR HEALTH REASONS Asia - Pacific 28.08.2020
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"