
The Diplomat, April 25, 2018
By Charlotte Gao
After weeks of tit-for-tat trade spat, China and the United States have each expressed a willingness to return to negotiations.
On April 24, in a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the White House, U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that a trade delegation, led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer, is “heading over China, at the request of China” for trade talks.
Taking a softer tone, Trump repeatedly highlighted his “very excellent” relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and praised Xi for being “very strong in helping us to solve” the North Korea problem.
Admitting that he did “play the trade card,” Trump expressed his confidence that “the trade will work out.”
“So the end result is, we’ll see. Maybe good things will happen and maybe we’re all wasting a lot of time. But hopefully it will be good for everybody concerned,” he added.
One day earlier, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Lu Kang had welcomed Mnuchin’s upcoming visit to Beijing during the regular press conference.
“China has received the information about the U.S. side hoping to come to Beijing for consultations on economic and trade issues and we welcome it,” Lu said.
Notably, also in a friendly tone, he expressed China’s willingness to solve the dispute through negotiation. He said:
I want to stress that China-U.S. economic ties are mutually beneficial in nature and have long been delivering tangible benefits to the business communities and consumers of the two countries. It is not surprising for China and the U.S., the two large economies, to have some problems in the economic field. These problems can be solved through bilateral consultations or within a commonly recognized multilateral framework. However, they can never be solved through unilateral means.
As The Diplomat has analyzed previously, the recent signals of detente are to be expected. The earlier noisy spat was only a bargaining tactic from both sides.
China’s national media has been harshly criticizing the United States’ “unilateral means” for weeks. Some Chinese nationalistic newspapers — Global Times for example — have been shouting day and night (mainly to domestic readers) that China cannot concede “even one inch” in the trade war with the United States.
Thus, what’s more interesting than the talks themselves is the way that both sides are trying to come back to the negotiating table without losing face.
Lu Kang claimed that it was the U.S. side that hoped to visit Beijing for talks. implying Washington had requested the meeting.
But according to Trump, the visit was initiated “at the request of China.”
“They [a Chinese delegation] came here, as you know, last week. And we’re having very substantive discussions on trade,” Trump said in his speech.
Yet when reporting Trump’s latest remarks, Xinhua, China’s national news agency, omitted the detail that Trump claimed China had initiated the upcoming trade talks. Meanwhile, Xinhua explained that the Chinese visit “last week” to Washington was not a special event, but happened “on the sidelines of spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, which concluded here [in Washington] last week.”
Whoever really initiated the upcoming talks in Beijing can remain ambiguous, as long as the trade dispute between the two super economies can be solved finally. A trade war will harm not only the two countries but also the rest of the world.
No comments yet.
- CROATIA DECLARES CHINA VICTORIOUS IN PELJESAC BRIDGE BATTLE – BUT WILL THE COURTS AGREE? The Balkans 26.04.2018
- EU SHELVES MACRON IDEA FOR 'EUROPEAN DARPA' Europe - EU 26.04.2018
- GOOD NEWS FOR UZBEKISTAN IS NOT GOOD NEWS FOR TURKMENISTAN Asia - Pacific 26.04.2018
- 9TH SARAJEVO BUSINESS FORUM BEGINS IN BOSNIA The Balkans 26.04.2018
- MACRON STUNS US CONGRESS WITH STRONG REBUKE OF TRUMPISM Europe - EU 26.04.2018
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"