Forbes, March 1, 2018
Kenneth Rapoza
Ukraine finally gets a win against Russia.
State-owned gas company, Naftogaz, was awarded $2.5 billion in a lengthy, ugly legal battle with Russian gas behemoth Gazprom. The Stockholm Arbitral Tribunal finally ruled on a years old dispute regarding natural gas transit fees in favor of the Ukrainians on Wednesday. Gazprom said they will appeal the ruling.
Russia's revenge began immediately on Thursday when Naftogaz learned of Gazprom's decision not to supply gas to Ukraine this month. Naftogaz said it had already paid for deliveries.
Russia and Ukraine's bitter divorce has Gazprom at the heart of the fighting. When former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych rejected a European trade deal in favor of cheaper Gazprom gas, Kiev erupted in protest. Many Ukrainians felt that Yanukovych was choosing Russian interests over sovereign, economic interests. Yanukovych was kicked out of power in 2014, setting off a firestorm of reactions by the Russians that ultimately led to the annexation of Crimea, a southeastern peninsula in the Black Sea and home to Russia's only warm water Naval port; and a separatist war pitting ethnic Russians and pro-Kremlin militants against the Ukrainian government in the Donbass region along the Russian border.
The move led to sectoral sanctions on Russian energy and finance and has ostracized Russia from the West. As the story goes, the Russians are the Cold War bad guys once again. It all started in Ukraine with these two energy companies going at each other's throats. The Russians seemed to always have the upper hand.
Gazprom is one of the world's leading natural gas producers. It has a market cap of roughly $58 billion.
For the Euromaidan movement activist of Ukraine, a Naftogaz legal victory would normally be boring news. But today it is more like the nuggets flowing out of the Robert Mueller Russia investigation: if it makes their enemy look bad, it's a score.
There are many scores to settle still. Gazprom has the muscle to pressure Naftogaz by any means necessary, insiders said.
Yesterday's tribunal in Stockholm found that Gazprom defaulted on its shipment obligations and awarded damages of $4.63 billion. The award means Gazprom has to make payments to Naftogaz in the order of $2.56 billion after residual payments for gas delivered in 2014 and 2015 have been settled.
Naftogaz
Court victory for Naftogaz comes within the Ukrainian company's expectations.
“We are pleased that we won the arbitration case on major accounts. This is an important day for the people of Ukraine and for the future of European gas markets”, Naftogaz CEO Andriy Kobolyev said in a statement.
Kobolyev has become a vocal opponent of Gazprom's planned Nord Stream II pipeline, connecting Russia to Germany via the Baltic Sea. The pipeline would sit adjacent to the already existent Nord Stream I. Kobolyev used the arbitration panel's ruling to take a swipe at the pipeline, which was sanctioned by Washington last summer but is not dead yet. He said today that Europe should "reconsider whether it is wise to let (Gazprom) strengthen its influence, which is already significant, on their market through the construction of Nord Stream."
The Tribunal did not grant Naftogaz's claim for revision of the transit tariff because Naftogaz’s 2009 request for revision did not fulfill the procedural requirements. The Tribunal also did not accept Naftogaz's claims for revision of the Transit Contract based on European and Ukrainian energy and competition law, noting that the implementation of regulatory reform on Ukrainian territory is a task for the Ukrainian authorities and not the Stockholm court.
No comments yet.
- PAKISTAN’S SHIELDS SUDDENLY STEP ASIDE, PLACING IT ON TERRORISM LISTING Asia - Pacific 02.03.2018
- PAKISTAN WELCOMES GHANI’S PEACE OFFER TO TALIBAN Asia - Pacific 02.03.2018
-
ARMENIA SCRAPS DEAL WITH TURKEY DESIGNED TO NORMALIZE RELATIONS The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 02.03.2018
- BRITISH PM TO OUTLINE POST-BREXIT TRADE TIES WITH EU Europe - EU 02.03.2018
- TURKMENISTAN: TAPI DEADLINE PUSHED BACK TO 2022? Asia - Pacific 02.03.2018
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"