EU Observer (11 April 2019)
Ahead of next month's vital European elections, there is a huge task ahead of us to rebuild trust in our political institutions.
Across Europe there is a backlash against what is perceived as the 'establishment', with extremism and disinformation on the rise.
We live in an era where basic facts are being questioned, and voters have lost faith in politics.
One way to restore trust is to create more openness and transparency.
It is therefore deeply disappointing that two years of talks to create a mandatory register of lobbyists shared among the three EU institutions have collapsed.
With the elections around the corner, any hope of securing this before the next parliamentary session have evaporated. And there is no guarantee talks will resume when the new term begins.
The EU's joint-transparency register lists thousands of lobbyists, but the European Parliament and the Council have their own specific reservations. The parliament has argued that a mandatory register violates an MEP's 'freedom of mandate'.
Lobbying can be a force for good and is a vital part of any democracy.
Ensuring that our elected representatives are well-informed is important, and making good law requires engagement with NGOs, charities and campaign groups.
But citizens have a right to know how MEPs are being influenced.
Personal experience
I was an MEP for nearly 20 years and I was frequently lobbied. There were many good examples, but there were also bad examples.
On one occasion at the start of this year, lobbyists for a major well-known international company turned up in my office uninvited seeking to talk to me. Stalking the corridors of power in the hope of cornering a politician is not right or proper.
Since leaving the European parliament in January I have taken on a new role as chief executive of the Open Knowledge Foundation.
My home is Scotland, and I engage with members of the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish government to promote digital openness and encourage decision-makers to work towards a more open society.
Last year, Scotland launched a new Lobbying Register following an act of parliament.
Every time I engage in face-to-face oral communication with an MSP or a government special adviser, and discuss Scottish government or parliamentary functions, it is a legal requirement to record the meeting and what was discussed – wherever it took place and whether it was planned or not.
Anyone can look at the register online because it is open.
The law is far from perfect – other forms of communication don't count, for example – but it is a very important step towards a more transparent political system in Scotland.
There is much that the EU could learn, and lobbying reform must become a political priority after the forthcoming elections.
One of the campaigns I worked on in recent years was the battle to save the internet from a copyright crackdown. Unfortunately, this was approved by MEPs last month.
It is expected to lead to the introduction of filters on websites, which will automatically remove content that could be copyrighted.
While entertainment footage is most likely to be affected, academics fear it could also restrict the sharing of knowledge, and I fear it will have a negative impact on freedom of speech and expression online.
In the run-up to the vote there was an intense lobbying campaign, which largely drowned out the concerns of ordinary citizens.
The giant music recording industry lobby and organisations representing publishers held dozens and dozens of meetings with decision-makers.
On the other side, Google and tech giants engaged in relentless rounds of lobbying.
In total, tens of millions of euros were spent.
Yet it is incredibly difficult for the millions of citizens affected by this type of decision to examine who is actually lobbying, and on what issue.
Ahead of next month's elections, we want voters to ask what their candidate has done to push for openness in their country? Have they signed up to key transparency legislation? Voiced support for access to information and freedom of expression?
If you're not sure, email and ask them.
We need a strong cohort of open champions at the European parliament to address the lack of transparency.
There are many of us who are working to bring together communities around the world to celebrate and prove the value of being open in the face of prevailing winds.
If we can build a more open world, we can also rebuild trust in our politics.
Catherine Stihler is a Scottish former MEP, and chief executive of the Open Knowledge Foundation
No comments yet.
- EU27 IS NOW FREE TO HOLD SUMMITS WITHOUT THE UK Europe - EU 11.04.2019
-
KAZAKHSTAN: RULING PARTY EXPECTED TO ANNOUNCE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ON APRIL 23
Central Asia
11.04.2019
- ‘BALKAN SPRING’ PROTESTS WILL REACH KOSOVO, KURTI PREDICTS The Balkans 11.04.2019
- MAMMADYAROV AND MNATSAKANYAN TO MEET IN MOSCOW ON APRIL 15 The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 11.04.2019
- ARMENIAN NATIONAL SECURITY SERVICE TAKING ON FAKE NEWS The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 11.04.2019
-
25.01.2016
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
12.06.2024
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
27.03.2023
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
17.03.2023
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
23.02.2023
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
03.02.2023
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
16.12.2022
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
07.12.2022
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
07.12.2022
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
01.01.2022
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
01.01.2022
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
03.06.2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
08.04.2020
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
12.06.2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
02.12.2016
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
01.07.2016
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
10.03.2016
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
24.01.2016
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
AVİM Conference Hall 24.01.2023
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"
