UNDERSTANDING THE IDEOLOGICAL BLOCKADES IN ARMENIA’S CONTEMPORARY POLITICS
Caucasus International Vol. 7 • No: 1 • Summer 2017
Armenia has been consistently violating international law since the declaration of independence in 1990 – a political choice which impedes not only regional peace, stability, and security, but also the interests of its own people. As a sovereign yet an unreliable member of international community, Armenia, has invaded a neighboring country, Azerbaijan, and refused to implement relevant UN resolutions. It has repeatedly made irredentist claims against the territorial integrity of another neighboring state, Turkey, and when the Zurich protocols were signed between Turkey and Armenia to establish diplomatic relations and develop bilateral relations in 2009 Armenia suspended the ratification.1 Even worse, Armenian President Serj Sargsyan recently expressed territorial claims towards Turkey, saying that “liberating the historic territories in Western Armenia” (implying eastern Turkey) “depend on younger generations”. This followed his statement that:
“I think my generation has managed to fulfill its debt when it was necessary to protect the part of our Motherland, [Nagorno-Karabakh], from the enemies. We managed to do it. I just want to say that every generation has its own responsibilities and must be able to fulfill them well.”
This irredentist, expansionist and hostile approach towards Azerbaijan and Turkey is accompanied by complicated relations with Georgia, leaving the country isolated and landlocked.
Historically speaking, this policy is the result of the complex and occasionally contradictory relationship between official Yerevan, Karabakh Armenians, and the extremist parties of the diaspora. On the other hand, it has been the ideologies historically produced/reproduced by all three parties that have led Armenia to disregard historical borders and the ethnic composition of the territories of its neighboring states. These factors, as this paper will argue, continue to shape the ethnic-nationalist and expansionist policies of Armenia.
The first part of this commentary analyses the basis of the specific ideology in power in Armenia, namely racism. The second and third parts describe the concrete manifestation of ethnonationalism, namely ethnic cleansing and terrorism, as well as their relevance in today’s Armenia.
The full commentary analyses can be accessed at: http://cijournal.az/post/commentary-understanding-the-ideological-blockades-in-armenias-contemporary-politics-by-maxime-gauin
© 2009-2020 Avrasya İncelemeleri Merkezi (AVİM) Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
Henüz Yorum Yapılmamış.
HISTORICAL DEBATES LEGITIMATED BY SUPREME COURTS
Maxime GAUIN 15.02.2017
PLEASE LEAVE HISTORY TO HISTORIANS - ARTICLE BY MAXIME GAUIN, DAILY SABAH, 21 MAY 2016
Maxime GAUIN 25.05.2016
MODERN ERMENİSTAN SİYASASINDAKİ İDEOLOJİK BLOKAJI ANLAMAK
Maxime GAUIN 22.09.2017
SOURCES ON 1915 INCIDENTS NEED TO BE ACADEMICALLY RESEARCHED
Maxime GAUIN 23.06.2017
POPE FRANCIS AND THE GHOST OF BENEDICT XV
Maxime GAUIN 29.09.2016
ERMENİ NÜFUZU YABANCI VEKİLLERİN TESCİLİ YASASI İÇİN BİR ÖRNEK VAKA TEŞKİL ETMEKTEDİR – THE DAILY CALLER – 05.02.2018
Raoul LOWERY-CONTRERAS 12.03.2018
TÜRKİYE-AZERBAYCAN İLİŞKİLERİNDE PSİKOLOJİK FAKTÖR - Halit GÜLŞEN
80TH ANNIVERSARY OF ANSCHLUSS: EUROPEAN VALUES BEING TRAMPLED AS FAR RIGHT RISES - DAILY SABAH - 04.04.2018
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 05.04.2018
TWO OPINION PIECES PUBLISHED IN THE EU OBSERVER - Europe Needs a Policy for Peace in Nagorno-Karabakh (by Nicolas Tavitian - 28.07.2017) & EU’s Role in Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Possibility of Peace (by Rovshan Rzayev - O3.09.2017)
YUNANİSTAN VE SIRBİSTAN’DAKİ SEÇİMLER NE GETİRDİ? - Dr. Erhan TÜRBEDAR