Hurriyet Daily News, 18 Oct. 2016.
There are several crucial issues that are overlooked when the Karabakh conflict is discussed. But these issues are likely to be brought to the agenda during the conflict resolution process. The report “Illegal Economic and Other Activities in the Occupied Territories of Azerbaijan,” which was presented to the U.N. Security Council by Azerbaijan on Aug. 16 brings up several of these issues. This detailed report, based on the data gathered from more than 500 press reports released by the Armenian press and official sources between the years 2010-2015, is an important document that discloses Armenia’s illegal activities in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan. These include illegal settlement policies, destruction or appropriation of historical and cultural heritage, exploitation of natural resources, illegal trade and economic activities, and violation of private and public property.
Armenia, either directly or via the de facto Armenian administration in Karabakh, has continued its illegal activities in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan with increasing frequency since the 1990s. As mentioned in the report, Armenia-registered companies, as well as foreign businesses, both finance and benefit from these illegal activities. These acts of the Armenian and foreign actors are violations of the “law of occupation” and “international humanitarian law.”
Since the beginning of clashes in 1988, Armenia has carried out a policy of “Armenianization” of the region. As part of this policy, especially since 2010, it has undertaken efforts to settle ethnic Armenians in occupied Azerbaijani territories to gain leverage in future peace talks. The OSCE, in its reports published in 2005 and 2010, confirmed these illegal attempts. The other leg of the “Armenianization” policy is the documented destruction of the Azerbaijani cultural and historical heritage.
These policies are violations of the relevant sections of the 1949 Geneva and 1954 Hague Conventions.
Furthermore, archeological excavations in these territories and the exhibition of historical artefacts in museums in Armenia are also breaches of international conventions such as the 1954 Hague Convention and the 1970 UNESCO Convention.
Economic activities carried out in the occupied Azerbaijani territories also amount to a violation of international law. For instance, Armenia illegally operates mines in the occupied territories. It also exploits water resources and forests. Technical infrastructure that belonged to Azerbaijan before the occupation is used illegally by Armenia. The ECHR, in a judgement in June 2015, determined that Armenia had violated private and public property rights in the occupied territories.
Some of the economic activities in the occupied territories are carried out by the Armenian state itself. Armenia-registered private companies also operate in these territories. Products produced in the occupied territories are commonly mislabeled as originating from Armenia to overcome export barriers to international markets. It is also an established fact that high-level Armenian government officials are involved in these activities. Consequently, it can be seen that illegal economic activities in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan are also factors that result in the consolidation of the oligarchic structure in Armenia.
Strikingly, third-country foreign companies are also involved in such activities via Armenia-registered front companies, thus gaining economic profit from the occupation. Among these are companies registered in the U.S., Germany, France, the Netherlands, Russia and Greek Cyprus. Whether the stances of these countries on the Karabakh conflict are influenced by the economic benefits their companies enjoy in the occupied territories is a curious question.
It must be recalled that during the Nuremberg trials German companies operating in territories occupied by Germany during World War II were charged with committing war crimes. In the current situation, not only the Armenian companies, but also the companies of the third country are at the same position with these German companies for violating the law of war and committing war crimes.
Notably, the true ownership of a number of these companies is unclear due to their secretive activities. This situation, when the world is haunted by global terrorism, points to larger security issues as a result of the occupation of Azerbaijani territories.
To sum up, Armenia’s economic activities and other activities that aim to change the cultural, demographic and physical structure of the occupied territories of Azerbaijan are criminal acts in terms of the “law of occupation” and “international humanitarian law” as defined in international conventions. In order to achieve a just resolution in the Karabakh conflict, real and corporate entities that commit or are involved in these acts will have to face the legal consequences of their acts. Alas, this aspect of the Karabakh conflict is usually overlooked by experts and the international community.
* Turgut Kerem Tuncel is a Senior Analyst at the Center for Eurasian Studies (Ankara).
© 2009-2020 Avrasya İncelemeleri Merkezi (AVİM) Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
Henüz Yorum Yapılmamış.
LAVROV’UN ERİVAN’DAKİ AÇIKLAMALARI TÜRKİYE-RUSYA İLİŞKİLERİNİN GELECEĞİNE İŞARET EDİYOR (ÖZEL)
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 18.10.2016
PUTIN: THE LEADER THAT FITS RUSSIAN AMBITIONS - HÜRRİYET DAILY NEWS - 23.03.2018
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 23.03.2018
REVERSALS OF RESOLUTIONS ON 1915 EVENTS
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 28.11.2016
WHAT’S NEXT AFTER PUTIN’S FOURTH ELECTORAL VICTORY? - HÜRRIYET DAILY NEWS - 30.03.2018
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 30.03.2018
CONCERNS REGARDING THE ZAPAD 2017 RUSSIA-BELARUS JOINT MILITARY DRILLS
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 09.09.2017
ORTA ASYA’DA AB: YENİ STRATEJİ, ESKİ FİKİRLER - AVRASYA ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ - 20.06.2019
Albina MURATBEKOVA 20.06.2019
PAKİSTAN’DA ORDU- SİYASET- YARGI DENKLEMİ VE DIŞ POLİTİKAYA YANSIMALARI
Gökçen OĞAN 22.01.2012
TAL BUENOS’ COMMENTARY ON THE BACKGROUND OF THE GENOCIDE HYPOTHESIS
Tal BUENOS 06.07.2015
GÜNEY KIBRIS’IN ÇARPIK İLİŞKİLERİ - HABERİNİZ.COM.TR - 25.08.2018
Ata ATUN 05.09.2018
COULD SREBRENICA GENOCIDE BEEN PREVENTED?
Erhan TÜRBEDAR 15.07.2011