EuroNews (17 July 2019)
The race for the EU's top job was supposed to be clear cut.
In the run-up to May's elections, European political parties nominated their candidate to be the next president of the European Commission.
The idea behind the so-called Spitzenkandidaten process is that whoever got the biggest share of the vote would also get their hands on the EU's top job.
It's part of a drive to promote democracy and was used to usher in Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission president in 2014.
But this year, with leaders of European countries unable to agree on a Spitzenkandidaten, it has been abandoned.
It means Manfred Weber, the candidate for the largest party in the European Parliament, the European People's Party (EPP), misses out.
Instead, Germany's defence minister, Ursula von der Leyen, was chosen by leaders of European countries and has now won the confidence of a majority of MEPs.
This all begs the question: is the Spitzenkandidaten process dead?
It has certainly not come cheap: the European Parliament spent over €1 million organising a pre-election debate between hopefuls for the EU's top job. The EPP has spent an estimated €5.5m campaigning and the Socialists and Democrats €1.9m.
"I don't think the system of the lead candidate is dead," Alberto Alemanno, an EU law professor at HEC Paris, told Good Morning Europe.
"Rather the opposite: we are finally having a conversation about the need to make a linkage between the citizens voting and the political colour of the European Commission.
"Even though the electorate didn’t necessarily know those candidates, didn’t know the rules of the game, still, the fact of having those candidates certainly played a favourable role in increasing media coverage, in personalising and even humanising the face of the next European Union."
Journalist name • Joao Vitor Da Silva Marques
Video editor • Joao Vitor Da Silva Marques
No comments yet.
- INDIA, CHINA ARE RESPECTING BILATERAL PACTS TO ENSURE PEACE, TRANQUILITY ALONG BORDER, RAJNATH SINGH TELLS LOK SABHA Asia - Pacific 18.07.2019
- GEORGIAN DREAM HEAD SUPPORTS INTERIOR MINISTER DESPITE PROTESTS DEMANDING RESIGNATION The Caucasus and Turkish-Armenian Relations 18.07.2019
- NEPAL, GERMANY TO HOLD JOINT POLITICAL CONSULTATIONS ANNUALLY Asia - Pacific 18.07.2019
- DATA OF 'NEARLY ALL ADULTS' IN BULGARIA STOLEN The Balkans 18.07.2019
- SPITZENKANDIDATEN: IS THIS THE END OF THE POLITICAL EXPERIMENT? Europe - EU 18.07.2019
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2023 -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"